What can we expect for ESPN UK?

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by colinthfc, Jun 26, 2009.


  1. Cobbler

    Cobbler Shoemaker To The Stars Full Member

    19,216
    2
    Dec 10, 2005
    Not sure I completely agree with that. It is impossible for a channel to launch from a standing start and immediately hit break even subscriber numbers. There is always going to be a period of loss-making building up the consumer base. The question is how realistic is the breakeven point and how long does it take to get there.

    I don't think we should take the fact that Setanta ran out of cash before they reached a profitable subscriber base as evidence that they weren't showing what people wanted to see. It can just as easily be seen as proof that they reached too ambitiously without deep enough pockets.
     
  2. D.Haye-no1-p4p

    D.Haye-no1-p4p Active Member Full Member

    776
    0
    Jan 10, 2008
    Oh, I thought it was ESPN.

    I don't have the channel but on the TV guide it says ESPN and Abraham live.

    Must still be showing as the Setanta programme schedule.
     
  3. bored

    bored rent boy Full Member

    1,774
    0
    May 19, 2008
    If ESPN are going to be serious rivals to sky and start buying some of skys programs then hopefully we'll see room for more boxing on sky as well as the boxing we'll get on ESPN.
     
  4. Cobbler

    Cobbler Shoemaker To The Stars Full Member

    19,216
    2
    Dec 10, 2005
    Which part of this aren't you getting?

    Showtime/HBO don't own the rights in the UK unless they buy those. Why would they buy them when they don't have broadcast outlets in the UK?

    Showtime/HBO own the rights to broadcast fights in the United States. If someone then wants to broadcast the fight in the UK, Germany or Nepal, they would buy the rights from whoever holds those - fighter(s) or promotion company depending on the arrangement for that promotion.

    Why are you saying 'look at Froch/Taylor' when it proves the exact opposite of your argument? Showtime broadcast the fight in the US, but had nothing to do with the rights in the UK. Mick Hennessy held the rights as part of the contract for the promotion of that fight. He was unable to find a buyer at the price he wanted and broadcast the fight on the internet instead.

    The only thing I can fathom where you might be getting confused is that I guess a fee would have to be payable to the US broadcaster if a UK broadcaster wanted to use their actual coverage, commentary, analysis, etc. But Sky or Setanta never did that, so I don't see why ESPN would either.
     
  5. felix

    felix Active Member Full Member

    840
    0
    Jun 25, 2009
    I think setanta did use hbo streams sometimes other than that your right.
     
  6. Paddy

    Paddy ESB Founders Club Full Member

    8,000
    1
    Apr 26, 2008


    hardly struggling mate........ I seem to remember they were rapidly expanding..... they were ambitious and wanted to challange sky and they got ripped off on the tv rights for the premier league thats what caused the problem

    the channell was doing fine with all the "niche" sports :deal
     
  7. Jordan

    Jordan Active Member Full Member

    925
    0
    Dec 24, 2008
    Has there been any statements/quotes reagdring ESPN Boxing at all?
     
  8. robpalmer135

    robpalmer135 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    28,342
    0
    Jun 29, 2007
    correct the right are purchased from top rank, golden boy, don king etc
     
  9. chrisfinch

    chrisfinch Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,178
    642
    Mar 21, 2009
    No, not even the slightest inclination they are interested.