What could David Haye have achieved if he fought everyone instead of just chasing k2

Right so you didn't want to admit that Valuev was the only Ring top ten he beat. A feat he only managed by the skin of his teeth too. The fact that Valuev was only considered a Ring top 10 in the first place because he won a robbery against a 50 year old Holyfield is also something to look at.......

Who cares that Haye held the WBA regular belt? I don't see anybody giving it much thought now that Povetkin has it despite him actually having decent CV as well as beating someone worthwhile to take the belt.

 

The part about Povetkin is irrelevant. I never said anything about him or the Belt he holds. So that shows your flawed argument position.

116-112 on two scorecards is not skin of your teeth either, nor is it comfortable I'll admit.

Once more I'll reiterate the ring top ten don't mean ****, especially in a **** division. We could make our own top 10 rankings and it would be worth as much as the ring comic. Haye if he hadn't chased K2 would have been a comfortable #3 and could even be #2 now as i believe he has a good shot at beating Vitali. He is comfortbale #3 now anyway ask anyone who knows **** about boxing

 

What in ****s name are you talking about, Chagaev is FINISHED. Peter is finished, Byrd has officially retired.

So you favour, shot Chagaev, shot Peter, retired Byrd, and non-entity Adamek over Haye at HW :huh

 

I'd have to disagree with you. At the very least Haye is certainly behind all of Cammarelle, Joshua, Dychko and Medzhidov. Sure none of these chaps have actually beaten a Ring top 10 fighter or any fighter at all in the pro ranks. In fact none have even turned pro yet but still, it should be clear to see that all of those from a mythical perspective are head to head monsters that would wipe the floor with anybody not named Klitschko.


1. Klitschko
2. Vitali.
3. Cammarelle
4. Medzhidov
5. Joshua
6. Dychko.

:deal

 

He dosen't have to fight everyone.. He is the 3rd best heavyweight, currently..

Come on now, those slow moving heavyweight ***gots like Povetkin or Fury or anyone can beat Haye? No way.. He is too quick for them.. and he has the hayemaker.. Not sure about his chin or toe though..

 

If that's your opinion fine, but those fine fighters are not relevant here, we're talking about Haye around the time he fought Wlad when these Behemoths were still developing

 

That's about right. I disagree about Peter being 50/50. Peter sucked too much even at his best. I don't even think Chagaev would be a favorite. I'd put him closer to 50/50.
It's not that Haye is amazing, it's that everyone else is so very bad.

 

Correct.

False

False

False

 

Manning you really are deluded, everyone knows the Klitscko's have the worst HW reign. Name 3 wins of Wlad's that are better than Haye. Name two of Vitali's. All of my statements were true, and Haye's is only awful because of the **** divison

FFS DKSAB

atschatschatsch

 

Dude Haye would destroy everyone in that list, are you stupid or what?:huh

 

what did he achieve?
winning a paper title? after wlad had just beat the **** out of the reigning WBA champion a few weeks earlier? :rofl

This content is protected

and he fights the biggest piece of crap every to lace up boxing gloves as a heavyweight, for that paper title

This content is protected