What could David Haye have achieved if he fought everyone instead of just chasing k2

What the hell, Chagaev?

Haye destroys any version of him, deary me.

Give me a break, no one is better than Haye from this era outwith the 2 brothers and even then, one of them is no longer better than him.

 

:good:good:good

 

You fukin deluded punk should have been perm banned and shot back in the head after Haye&Wlad.

 

yeah he is the best, with all of 5 heavyweight wins in 4 years as a heavyweight, makes him the giant fraud he is. keep pumping this guy up, with great wins over

38 year old Monte Barrett (lost 3 of 6)
36 year old Valuev in his last fight, might as well have been 50
40 year old Audley , not even ranked
38 year old John Ruiz (lost 3 of 6)
Chisora who had lost 3 of 4

:rofl

joke

 

False.

Beat a Klitschko. Something Haye's never come close to doing.

Ko'd a prime former unified lineal champ twice!

Of course Toney is an ATG. You'll have a hard time having anyone bar you to say otherwise.

 

Because you're posting so much crap, I'm going to step in on this post

Byrd fought both, and had three fights with the brothers! Haye only fought Wlad once. What would Byrd's record against the Klitscho's be if he only fought Wlad once?

Rahman was in his prime in 2006? atsch

No he's not an ATG, and he's certainly not an ATG at HW!

 

Excellent post KO artist, you've brought balance and facts to this debate, against some guy who wants some killed for saying Haye would beat Wlad.

He twists facts like with Rahman. As for Byrd haye needs a shot at Vitali before you can fully compare him to Byrd.

Also it's good to see someone else say Toney isn't an ATG at any weight let alone f**king HW where he only participates due to the mcdonanld's training camp

:yep:yep:yep

deal:deal

 

What about the other time The Big O destroyed this former unified and lineal champ just prior to 2000?

 

i keep walking into threads full to the brim with ******s talking all kinds of crap.

this is a thread full of ******s. you're one of them.

haye would knock povetkin out late. he's just too fast for him. and he hits too hard. did you see the trouble that a very limited huck gave him? and you don't think a much better fighter in haye could beat him? crazy!

and johnson? whatever, man. this guys a bum.

 

Heartfelt greeting moneypaysbills

It's always refreshing to see posters like yourself, who are able to look through the hype and propaganda, and get straight to the point

So he beat a prime Rahman once, you said twice which was wrong

Besides, Rahman was never that good anyway

 

Yes but this era's **** remember so obviously a unified lineal champ from the last amazing era must be spectacular. No way a guy like that would get dominated constantly in this "**** era". Going how **** this era is it's quite clear that the former unified lineal champ should make mince meat of Povetkin tomorrow.

 

Exactly rahman's defining moment was knocking out lewis and then lewis then knocked him out anyway. As a klittard you know the value of rematching wins, even if lewis didn't use his brother to avenge the defeat

 

This era is ****

 

I'm not a Klittard. I don't blindly nuthug any individual fighter like you.

 

Neither do I, you fool. I've always said Haye would be no. 3 and now is possibly no. 2. Not like you and your blind defense of the klitscko's and their record.