Ratings can be very subjective and sometimes rather than results get based on personal feelings or sometimes justifiably on historical wins My question is, how many wins or years should it be before someone moves in the ratings Not that ratings are done this way But if ratings were based on the last 3 fights for example how it would go? Usyk - Fury, Dubois, Joshua Dubois - Joshua, Hrgovic, Miller Parker - Zhang, Wilder, Kean Fury - (loss) Usyk, Ngannou, Chisora Joshua - (loss) Dubois, Ngannou, Wallin Kabayel - Sanchez, Makmudov, Smakici Zhang - Wilder, (loss) Parker, Joyce Etc Or if based on years, how many? Take the last 2 years or so, say beginning of September 2022 to make a whole month Usyk - Fury, Dubois Dubois - Joshua, Hrgovic, Miller, (loss) Usyk, Lerena Parker - Zhang, Wilder, Kean, Opelu, Massey, (loss) Joyce Fury - (loss) Usyk, Ngannou, Chisora To give an idea So What is the criteria you use? Is it a personal feeling Personal favourite Results? And based over what period Timescales?
1. Who beat who? 2. Career achievements 3. Perceived current head to head potential In that order mostly
Who beat who, how, when. Any other "extracurricular" achievements like unifying, being a multi-time champion, etc
Brit Level is the only criteria we should apply Usyk isn't British but he's very much Brit Level Elite Brit Level Elite of the elite Brit Level In the good old days when boxing was a regional sport the gold standard (ie. before the Brits and the Soviets took over) was American level but I consider all those fighters from back then bums. Yep, you read that right guys. BUMS.
This forum ranks depending on who they like or hate Fury is a useless bum for losing to an mma guy, but usyk is the goat for scraping by the same useless bum who mangled his face
Hey, hey- HOLD ON NOW SERGE The gold standard was actually Korean Level; Watch this guy if you have time. JUNG KOO CHANG LEVEL This content is protected "American Level" Tsk tsk tsk. Playing right into their hands.
Yes This may be the correct and most accurate way I was looking at the real non bias HW top 10 and to my surprise it was something like Usyk Dubois Fury Joshua Whyte Wardley Clarke Itauma Chisora Fisher As I recall it
I get that but I was asking how long before you think well that win was years ago and they haven't done much since For example with say Fury and Dubois last 3 fights Dubois - Joshua, Hrgovic, Miller Fury - (loss) Usyk, Ngannou, Chisora Last 2 years Dubois - Joshua, Hrgovic, Miller, (loss) Usyk, Lerena Fury - (loss) Usyk, Ngannou, Chisora So would you have Dubois rated above or below Fury based on Fury having some greater wins years back?
I get that but I was asking how long before you think well that win was years ago and they haven't done much since For example with say Fury and Dubois last 3 fights Dubois - Joshua, Hrgovic, Miller Fury - (loss) Usyk, Ngannou, Chisora Last 2 years Dubois - Joshua, Hrgovic, Miller, (loss) Usyk, Lerena Fury - (loss) Usyk, Ngannou, Chisora So would you have Dubois rated above or below Fury based on Fury having some greater wins years back?
I get that but I was asking how long before you think well that win was years ago and they haven't done much since For example with say Fury and Dubois last 3 fights Dubois - Joshua, Hrgovic, Miller Fury - (loss) Usyk, Ngannou, Chisora Last 2 years Dubois - Joshua, Hrgovic, Miller, (loss) Usyk, Lerena Fury - (loss) Usyk, Ngannou, Chisora So would you have Dubois rated above or below Fury based on Fury having some greater wins years back?
I think Fury did better then Dubois against Usyk. Although Dubois did get unlucky with the low blow call. Dubois is certainly breathing down Fury’s neck now.
No I don't, but the forum seems that way I like Fury, but I don't think he's a top tier heavy I'm just using him as an example. Many say his resume sucks and Ngannou beat him which shows his real level. That's fine,nothing wrong with an opinion. However, when the same guys big up Usyk winning a competitive fight against Fury like it was Ali v Foreman? Then that's double standards You either rate someone or you don't despite personal feelings