What did Marciano do right?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Mr.DagoWop, Feb 20, 2017.


  1. Mr.DagoWop

    Mr.DagoWop Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,129
    1,762
    Jul 1, 2015
    He cut easily, he was easy to hit, he was slow, he was small, and he had no jab among other things claimed by critics on here.

    According to those who argue against Marciano's success outside of his era what attributes did he posses that could be considered a threat? Don't mention easy things like punch, stamina, or chin.
     
  2. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,070
    27,898
    Jun 2, 2006
    His biggest asset was being born in 1923!
     
    Seamus, mrkoolkevin and BlackCloud like this.
  3. Mr.DagoWop

    Mr.DagoWop Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,129
    1,762
    Jul 1, 2015
    Not really, he became eligible for the draft barely 2 months before the United States entered the deadliest war in history. I wouldn't call that an asset.
     
    lloydturnip likes this.
  4. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    50,312
    23,319
    Jan 3, 2007
    LMAO, I was going to say the same thing before clicking on the thread.
     
    mrkoolkevin and mcvey like this.
  5. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    50,312
    23,319
    Jan 3, 2007
    For being a heavyweight champion in the early to mid 50's I would !!!
     
    mcvey likes this.
  6. Mr.DagoWop

    Mr.DagoWop Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,129
    1,762
    Jul 1, 2015
    I said that in relation to the war. Even for being a heavyweight champ that is not an asset. If Marciano had turned pro at 18 like most fighters back then, then he would have most likely fought a better version of Joe Louis and might even have lost in brutal fashion. When he won the title he only had about 1 or 2 years left that were considered prime so even then age wasn't an asset.
     
    dempsey1234 likes this.
  7. ETM

    ETM I thought I did enough to win. Full Member

    13,063
    11,225
    Mar 19, 2012
    The delivery of his punches. He had power we know, but if you cant deliver it doesn`t help you. Rocky had certain moves that his opponents never caught on too. An athletes feel or instinct perhaps. To get in position to land his shots and then pull the trigger. I also don`t think he was slow. He had a quickness when he needed It that served him well.
     
  8. The Kentucky Cobra

    The Kentucky Cobra Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,576
    2,516
    Jan 9, 2017
  9. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,623
    Mar 17, 2010
    What you're describing is far more important than than technique.
    It's awareness.

    Your opponent could be technically gifted, but if you have a feel for where and when to step in, block, throw a punch, etc, it's far better.
     
  10. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    28,200
    33,881
    Jan 8, 2017
    He had something no other heavy champ had, the ability to beat every guy in front of him. While some will argue about the quality of the opponents it's still a fact that no boxer or brawler could defeat him. How ever he did it he did it. Luck, timing, performance , perseverance, determination what ever but in over a hundred years no man as managed that. That's what I give him credit for.
     
  11. joe brown

    joe brown Keep it Simple Full Member

    325
    287
    Jan 22, 2017
    outside the suze cue I don't think he had ay other attributes his incredible heart, will, determination and conditioning is what makes him a great fighter. know one ever treated that belt with as much respect as he did you would have to kill him to get that belt
     
  12. dempsey1234

    dempsey1234 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,764
    269
    Jun 25, 2012
    D, Marciano on this forum done nothing right, so why bother. You'll be called a fanboy by know nothings.
     
  13. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,623
    Mar 17, 2010
    I'm convinced he is the most misunderstood champion in HW history.
    1 year ago, the general consensus was based on a Goldman quote from his first time meeting a raw Marciano.

    Honestly it's the reason I sorta go to bat for him on every thread. The consensus is just disproportionately off the mark. To me, it's like seeing everyone praise Ali, Liston, Foreman, Dempsey, Wlad, and all of a sudden saying that Holmes was bad.

    Like wait...huh?
     
    Last edited: Feb 20, 2017
    Fergy likes this.
  14. mostobviousalt

    mostobviousalt Active Member banned Full Member

    519
    103
    Jun 4, 2016
    It wasn't a that deadly war for Americans (relative to elsewhere)

    He's lucky all the talented Europeans got killed or couldn't box anymore for whatever reason.
     
  15. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    50,312
    23,319
    Jan 3, 2007

    Its not about age.. Its about TIMING. He cleaned up on a decaying era of aging men and fighters who weren't indigenous to the division. In most other time periods he wouldn't have had this convenience. Hence being born in 1923 was advantageous..
     
    mcvey and mrkoolkevin like this.