What do you consider as the best decade in boxing?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by dpw417, Apr 29, 2008.


  1. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    405
    Jun 14, 2006
    1980's.

    The fab four all fighting one another, Holmes reign, Tyson's rise, Arguello vs Pryor fights, Salvador Sanchez clearing out the division, Julio Cesar Chavez, Whitaker coming up, Hagler's domination of the middleweights. A glorious time.
     
  2. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    279
    Jul 22, 2004
    40s followed by 80s

    90s is pretty damned good too:

    RJJ
    Whitaker
    Mayweather
    Lewis
    Tyson
    Holyfield
    Delahoya
    Trinidad
    Hamed
    Barrera
    Morales
    Ike Quartey
    Chavez
    Tyszu
    Mosley
    Stevie Johnston
    Hopkins
    Eubank
    Benn
    Nunn

    IMO 90s has the best HW scene ever


    Bowe,
    Golota,
    mercer,
    Morrison,
    Wlad,
    Vitali,
    Ike Ibeauchi
    Rudduck
    Maskeev
    McCall
    Bruno
     
  3. Sonny's jab

    Sonny's jab Guest

    For greatest depth of talent I'd say the 1920s or 1930s because that was when there were numerous boxing venues and fights happening all the time. Basically, boxing's heyday was between the WWI and WWII.

    When Harry Greb, Benny Leonard, Jack Dempsey, Gene Tunney, Mickey Walker, Tommy Loughran, Mike Gibbons, Johnny Dundee etc. were fighting. And boxing was massive in Europe and the European colonies at the time too. In the 1920s.

    Then, in the 1930s, the Depression years, with Joe Louis, Henry Armstrong, Panama Al Brown, Jimmy McLarnin, Tony Canzoneri, Barney Ross, Kid Chocolate, Billy Conn etc.

    And there are loads of lesser known fighters with incredible records from these periods. In America it was Irish, Jews, Italians, and Blacks, and other ethnic mixes, all producing great fighters. And countries all over the globe were producing good contenders and champions.
    I dont think boxing ever quite reached those heights again. Venues closed down quickly at the beginning of WWII and although the 40s and 50s were good eras the TV coverage further decimated the boxing shows.
     
  4. OLD FOGEY

    OLD FOGEY Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,670
    99
    Feb 18, 2006
    What you say about the twenties and thirties is largely true, but you might be minimizing the impact of segregation on American boxing prior to the Joe Louis era. Black prospects did not recieve proper training or opportunities and so this talent pool was stunted at its roots. There was a tremendous influx of black talent starting in the late thirties and carrying on into the forties.
    WWII crippled boxing in Europe for a few years, but the impact in the US was brief and boxing seemed to be back on track within a year or two after the war ended. The fight clubs reopened. It was free fights on TV, not WWII, which killed the fight clubs in the end.
    It also should be noted that Latin America and East Asia produced more good fighters in the 50's & 60's than they had prior to WWII.
     
  5. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,088
    3,779
    Sep 14, 2005

    Ummm most of these guys are umimpressive
     
  6. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    279
    Jul 22, 2004
    Thats not mentioning the top 3 HWs of Lennox, Tyson, Holy (which I already mentioned).

    The 90s were without doubt the biggest punchers in HW history.

    Give me a better top15 than the 90s HWs
     
  7. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,088
    3,779
    Sep 14, 2005
    This is all opinion. I agree 1990s is up there as punchers, but 1940s and 1970s had alot of punchers too.....1990s heavyweights are known for stamina problems, constantly showing up out of shape, and did not have top notch boxing skills the 1980s heavyweights had.
     
  8. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    405
    Jun 14, 2006
    I pick Frazier, Foreman, Norton, Shavers, Young, Ali, Holmes over Golota, Mercer, Morrison, Wlad, Vitali, and McCall.
     
  9. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    279
    Jul 22, 2004
    You missed Tyson, Lewis, Holyfield, anyway the 70s hasnt got a top15 to compare to the 90s.
     
  10. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    279
    Jul 22, 2004
    In terms of just punchers nothing compares to the 90s its not oppinion its fact, the punchers were brutal, plenty of 1 KO finnishes, the men were carrying 30-40lbs more muscle than other eras

    The thing about the 90s is they may have had bigger punchers due to improvements with steroids, supplements, weight training.
     
  11. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,088
    3,779
    Sep 14, 2005

    Steroid Muscle Doesnt equate power. If you give heavyweights from other era supplements, steroids too.....they would hit as hard if not harder than 90s heavyweights.
     
  12. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    66,154
    53,570
    Feb 11, 2005
    I guess I was thinking more of the HW division which was horrible with a disinterested Holmes fighting juveniles, light heavies,white hopes and never was opponents, also a splintering of titles where every crackhead and junkie held a belt. The last few years were at least fun watching Tyson clean up that mess.
     
  13. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    66,154
    53,570
    Feb 11, 2005
    This will always be the case.
     
  14. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    55,243
    49,603
    Apr 27, 2005
    I'm hearin' ya mate.