What do you consider to be Floyd and Manny's top 10 wins?

:rant:rant:rant

 

Your Floyd list is

 

I'm more than likely older than you

And your list is hilarious

 

I've been watching boxing since 1982, mate.

Who the f*ck is Chinero Hernandez? Do you mean GENARO Hernandez? That was one of the funniest parts of your list. You put "C. Hernandez", which would be CARLOS Hernandez over "G. Hernandez", which would be GENARO Hernandez. So you have the wrong Hernandez on your list and then you have Robert f*cking Guerrero on as well? And then you want to put BALDOMIR on as well? :verysad You make yourself look more foolish every time you speak.

 

Just wait until you see his scorecards He scored one of the Jones/Tarver fights 119-117. I'm not kidding. He has never seen a round he couldn't score 10-9. He scored Khan/Collazo 117-115 for Khan in a fight where both fighters had a point deducted, Khan scored 3 KDs and most everyone in the world felt won 11 or 12 rounds. 2 of the judges scored it 119-104 He would have had Collazo winning without the KDs :lol

 

Well I would say he's bad poster in terms of his understanding of boxing in terms how fights should be scored and where guys rank all time, along with some other rather basic things. He is also blindly stubborn in the face of facts which can be extremely frustrating. I once had a discussion with him where he was criticizing the punch output of a welterweight who averaged 70 punches per round. I asked him what he thought a high volume of punches would be and he said that it depended on weight class. I agreed and asked him what would be a lot for a heavyweight. He replied that at HW, a guy like Vitali usually throws 100 punches. That has NEVER happened once in a compubox tracked HW fight. The most EVER is 85/round in a HW fight. I asked him to give me some examples of Vitali throwing 100 punches per round and he said the Arreola fight...in which Vitali actually threw 50 punches per round. When I pointed this out he said that the German commentators said Vitali was throwing 100 punches per round and the difference in our figures was due to Compubox being run by Americans who are biased against Vitali. I pointed out that even if this were the case it was rather unlikely that the compubox operators had missed HALF of the punches Vitali threw, which would come out to 400 punches over 8 rounds against Arreola. He then said that the American compubox operators never give Vitali credit for punches that landed... which of course had absolutely zero to do with what we were talking about... I tried to get back to the original discussion and asked him how many punches would be a lot for a welterweight. He replied that it depends on the level of competition but that when in shape he was able of throwing upwards of 200 punches per round without an opponent. I pointed out that this example was not particularly germane to the discussion. You get the point....

He is unbelievably difficult to have a logical discussion with. In part this is probably due to the language barrier so I don't blame him entirely. And I agree that he's a perfectly nice guy who does try to back up what he's saying. And he's certainly not swayed by the common opinion if he can score Khan/Collazo 117-115 But IMO he's just so wildly off base on a LOT of things and unwilling to budge an inch on anything he says that it drives me nuts.

Rant complete. :rant