What do you guys think?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Armstrong!, Jun 22, 2011.


  1. Armstrong!

    Armstrong! Active Member Full Member

    1,008
    3
    Jun 10, 2011
    I didn't make this. At some points it was outrageous! It's a top 100 P4P list, please read over it.

    He had Bob Fitzsimmons very low, and had Jack Johnson and Jack Dempsey very high.

    http://bleacherreport.com/articles/...t-pound-for-pound-boxers-of-all-time/page/101

    It was alright but really, the author quite obviously didn't look into the depth of Fitzsimmon's resume. Or Harry Greb's for that matter.

    Greb isn't in the top 10! :huh
     
  2. Armstrong!

    Armstrong! Active Member Full Member

    1,008
    3
    Jun 10, 2011
  3. Armstrong!

    Armstrong! Active Member Full Member

    1,008
    3
    Jun 10, 2011
  4. DonBoxer

    DonBoxer The Lion! Full Member

    8,063
    34
    Apr 28, 2010
    This content is protected
     
  5. Boilermaker

    Boilermaker Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,372
    473
    Oct 6, 2004
    I didnt get to look at the full list, but the first page article which goes on about Pound for pound rankings being invented for Sugar Ray Robinson is a bit of a joke. From there the only surprise is that he actually knew who harry greb was.
     
  6. Armstrong!

    Armstrong! Active Member Full Member

    1,008
    3
    Jun 10, 2011
    :lol: I needed to get some feedback. :think
     
  7. DonBoxer

    DonBoxer The Lion! Full Member

    8,063
    34
    Apr 28, 2010
    Massive over rating of Louis, Johnson, Dempsey and Marciano.

    Foreman is about 20 places higher P4P than Hearns. Yikes.
     
  8. kmac

    kmac On permanent vacation Full Member

    5,005
    15
    Jul 29, 2010
    there's some questionable one listed for sure, just like with any top 100 list. calzaghe being included is an effing joke.