What do you rate as the most controversial draw in boxing history?

I'm not picking anything apart. You asked me and I answered. I asked you 2 questions and you still refuse to answer which, quite frankly, I am not surprised. Plus you contradicted yourself. I'm just writing down facts that you refuse to address because all that you are interested in is your own agenda, which is consistent for you. I'm not butthurt. I'm just writing down facts that you simply refuse to address. You're the one who's butthurt as your avoidance of the facts in question indicate that you simply have no answer. And I've given both Calzaghe and Hopkins their due as fighters so I have no idea what you're talking about there.

 

Lmmfao. I don't even like Hopkins. I see you still have no answers for my questions. I'll be waiting for them. Actually i won't because you'll never answer them. It's ok buddy. It's ok, lmmfao.

 

Obviously delusion is your condition lmmfao. Another question for you which you simply will not answer because you cant. How can I be butthurt about Hopkins losing to Calzaghe when A. I admitted Calzaghe won by 2 or 3 points and B. I DON'T EVEN LIKE HOPKINS IN THE FIRST PLACE, lmmfao. So sorry you've been exposed. Don't worry buddy. I know any answer from you is not forthcoming (from the THREE questions I've asked). It's ok oh butthurt one.

 

I didn't like cheating Bernard Hopkins for the reasons I mentioned in earlier posts long before the Calzaghe fight so he most definitely DID NOT let me down. The only thing that let me down about him is his classless behavior and his continuous cheating. But it's obvious that you are butthurt because middleweight Jermaine Taylor beat a better version of JC did TWICE lol. I see that you still refuse to answer the THREE questions I've posed to you. It's ok buddy. It's ok.

 

Wow. You responded after midnight your time. You must be so butthurt that you're in ribbons by now. It's ok buddy. It's ok. Need a hug?

 

Then I suppose you spend your otherwise sleep time responding to this thread, but STILL AVOIDING, the questions I posed to you pal. It's ok oh butthurt one. We all know you'll never answer. And I'm not butthurt that Calzaghe beat those 2 as Hopkins was overrated at lightheavy and Jones was a serial show boater so deserved it when Calzaghe did it to him. But, it's obvious that you are butthurt over Taylor beating a better version of Hopkins TWICE. It's ok buddy. You can keep avoiding the questions. It's ok. Need a hug?

 

Ah, more misinformation from the butthurt one. You are aware that Hopkins weighed 156 for Oscar DeLaHoya (ironically one of Hopkins better victories ) just TEN MONTHS before facing Taylor, aren't you? Here's yet ANOTHER question that you will refuse to answer. How could Hopkins be drained at 160 just 10 months after fighting at 156? I'll be waiting for your answer. Actually I won't be because you won't. And I saw both of those fights and had Taylor close but clear in one and the other could have gone either way. It's ok buddy. You must be really needing that hug bout now:hi:

 

NICE. You STILL haven't answered any of my questions. It's ok oh butthurt one. It's ok. I'm sure needing a hug is your priority right now. It's ok. However 1st of all, I IMMEDIATELY gave 2 examples of 2 sets of prime great fighters going at it, so your statement, "If it requires you to beat a great fighter to become a great fighter, then nobody in history is great fighter, because it would be impossible to become one in the 1st place," is obviously absolute garbage as proven by my examples. I never wrote Hopkins wasn't a great fighter, as you can make a case for him being a great middleweight (even though his best victory there and in his career is Tito), and he lost 2x to Taylor at that weight. What I wrote was that he was overrated - ESPECIALLY at lightheavy where 2 of his 3 best career victories according to you were, even though those fighters were moving up to lightheavy for the 1st time. And I also wrote that his class is measured by longevity, certainly not by the (lack of) high level victims that were naturally the same size as him and close to prime. And you still didn't answer which one was a better victory: junior middle Winky or middle Pavlik,. Not only can't you answer simple questions, but you can't get your facts straight either lol. Huggy time for you, buddy.