What do you think about Muhammad Ali's boxing fundamentals?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Flo_Raiden, Jul 24, 2012.


  1. Jackomano

    Jackomano Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,164
    6,792
    Nov 22, 2014
    This. Ali’s fundamentals were top notch and he was a very versatile fighter, but was also confident in his natural abilities, so he would often limit his skill set both to make his matches fan friendly and as a way to showcase his overall superiority.

    I remember listening to a interview from the early 60’s with people calling Ali and asking him questions such as why he didn’t attack to the body and use more conventional defense and his reasoning was it would make his matches boring and that people paid money to see him look good and exciting and not like an amateur boxer.

    Joe Frazier also used this reasoning for changing the fighting style of his son Marvis, since Frazier also said that as a pro that you have to win in an exciting fashion if you expect people to pay good money to tune in. He mentioned that the style that Benton developed for Marvis would’ve made Marvis boring as a pro and it also would’ve made it hard for Marvis to get matches.
     
    Bogotazo likes this.
  2. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,821
    12,487
    Jan 4, 2008
    I'd say Ali's fundamentals are underrated. Look at his fight against Miteff, for example, where he does a lot of nice work on mid-range and also quite a bit of body punching. He also paid a price of getting hit unusually much in this fight, so maybe he felt that he'd be better off staying on long range and not going to the body. It obviously worked.

    When he aged, I think he partly adapted to his declining physical assets. In Manilla for example he didn't do much wrong from a standpoint of fundamentals. Even showed some nice in fighting.
     
    Bogotazo and Pat M like this.
  3. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,623
    Mar 17, 2010
    Perhaps the most technically sound fighter of all time.

    He wasn’t by the book. Because the book can’t teach you how to fight like Ali. If it could, it would.
     
  4. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,330
    Jun 29, 2007

    That could have been your best post. Ali had some weaknesses. Good chatters went to town on him, he was open to the left hook, and he was zero as an infighter.

    Ali had no real left hook, uppercut and wasn't a body puncher.

    Very lucky to win Norton III, and Young.
     
  5. Pat M

    Pat M Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,577
    3,848
    Jun 20, 2017
    Ali had good fundamentals when he used them. Against physically over matched fighters like Folley, Patterson, Terrell, Williams, Cooper...his 60s competition he didn't have to worry about fundamentals, he could do what he wanted. Ali had the advantage in size, speed, strength, and in most cases amateur experience. Against Foreman, Norton, Lyle, Bugner, the bigger, more athletic fighters he fought in the 70s he often would fight more conventionally. If Ali had the opponents in the 60s that he had in the 70s, he might have been a better fundamental fighter, but he would also have had more wear and tear on his body. There is always a trade off.
     
    ETM and Bokaj like this.
  6. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,821
    12,487
    Jan 4, 2008
    He also slowed down in the 70's, which meant he couldn't fight the same way anymore.
     
  7. ETM

    ETM I thought I did enough to win. Full Member

    13,046
    11,193
    Mar 19, 2012
    Eddie Futch studied Ali. In doing that he noticed that Ali didn't know how to throw an uppercut properly. He didnt bend his knees and get low enough. This exposes his chin more.
    Watch Rd 15 FOTC you can see Eddie Futch "ain't as dumb as he looks" as Ali would say.
     
  8. Glass City Cobra

    Glass City Cobra H2H Burger King

    10,171
    17,358
    Jan 6, 2017
    Yes the Lyle stoppage was one of the most brilliant set ups ive seen in boxing. Picture perfect with excellent timing and form.
     
    Jay1990 likes this.
  9. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    51,339
    41,244
    Apr 27, 2005
    And it was one of the silliest things one could do to Marvin. Benton was doing so much better with him.
     
  10. destruction

    destruction Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,227
    12,601
    Mar 26, 2009
    Technique was above average but in comparison to other ATGs was very poor.

    His strengths were his movement and athleticism and that touch and run, and grab style. He got out of jail in some of his fights because of an iron chin and corrupt paid off judges. In his prime his two biggest strengths were his chin and his movement/athleticism.
     
  11. ETM

    ETM I thought I did enough to win. Full Member

    13,046
    11,193
    Mar 19, 2012
    Yes. Joe deserved all the criticism he got for changing Marvis' style. It wasn't broke no need to fix it. I think it was Joe's ego.
     
    Stiches Yarn likes this.
  12. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    51,339
    41,244
    Apr 27, 2005
    Trying to make him like dad for sure. Marvis was going quite well.
     
  13. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,065
    27,869
    Jun 2, 2006
    Good chatters?
     
    JohnThomas1 likes this.
  14. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,065
    27,869
    Jun 2, 2006
    Ali retreated in a straight line,he nearly always circled anti-clockwise,his right hand was out of position when he jabbed,he seldom threw a body punch or a decent left hook,[Bonavena was a singular exception].His fundamentals were no better than average imo .His physical gifts however were off the charts.
     
    destruction likes this.
  15. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,821
    12,487
    Jan 4, 2008
    I recommend everyone to watch the Miteff fight. Nice fight and some nice work by Ali that you don't normally associate with him.