How is Haye relevant? He has had ONE FIGHT since his embarrassing toe fight for the title, which was nearly two years ago. If he wants to be relevant he should, you know, FIGHT.
david haye is a talented prize fighter. but he does not like to fight.some guys fight because there good at it but dont like it at all. thats david haye.thats what comes to mind when i hear the name david haye
yeah, but a "British fraud" that would spank any New Yorker if there was any. just like we Brits always do. then again, they'd probably ***** out and duck. just like two famous New Yorkers did when a Brit was on their case. anyone remember Mike Tyson and Riddick Bowe? too scared to take their beatings. like good boys. :yep
Vitali talks about what he's going to do to David, but when David agrees to the fight, Vitali makes his excuses and runs. that's pretty sad. if he's the better fighter, then he should get in the ring and prove it. just like he said he would. but no. he's doing the ironing or something.
yeah, but Enzo beat a former world champ in Braithwait. it was a good win for Haye. the only reason Enzo kept losing was due to him getting in there with the best. they were all punchers as well. he should have rebuilt himself but pushed himself too quickly. it didn't work out for him, but it was still a good win at the time for Haye. no doubt about it.
Better thread would have asked what we think of David Haye's tenure in the heavyweight division specifically. I'd go with the last option on that one, but as is I chose the second.