From the heavyweight blog. http://www.heavyweightblog.com/211/mike-tyson-kos-wladimir-klitschko-in-1-round
This is the blog writer who said Jean Marc Mormeck would've been the best opponent Muhammad Ali had ever faced. I tried to read some of his post, but it's all over the place. The general theme for all the posts are ... the records of the all-time greats are terrible ... and the Klitschkos are the best ... and Jean Marc Mormeck was better than anyone Ali ever beat ... and Mormeck was just one of Wlad's easy defenses. So ... enter at your own risk.
I think the article is rubbish, as is the entire blog. However, prime Wlad might well win against prime Tyson, in a boring display of clinching and leaning and jabbing and right hands enough to slow Tyson down. Yes, Tyson's chance is to get him out of there in the first 2 or 3 rounds. Possible but a tough proposition.
This guy is a math-oriented boxing person with some points. I think Vitali beats Tyson. Tyson at his best likely beats Wlad. 2 years back Tyson said he wasn;t sure if he could either of them. Tyson fans to me are the most delusional bunch, always thinking Tyson would replicate his 1st or 2nd best performance, then coming up with excuses when the event ended. ^^ his points back up by an authority.
Did he really say it like that? Cna you re-post it here. Most boxing people have an opinion that s way out there. It doesn't mean 90% of their stuff is wrong. I think he's got some points.
Fair enough, I also think Tyson beats Wladimir at his best but loses Vitali by decision maybe even late round KO.
