What does Anthony Joshua need to do to be named greatest heavyweight of all time?

I was arguing that he wouldn't walk through anyone in the 70s, which he wouldn't. I'd favour Ali and Foreman over him.(Holmes too, if you count him from 70s)

He wouldn't walk through them, but would beat most of them. And he's retired now, has been for over 2 months. Yeah, when you need to name a retired guy who hasn't won a fight in 2.5 years to make a case for the current era being strong, It means you're desperate.

I already said that I'd pick any version of Wlad over Young, but apparently you're too idiotic to comprehend with it. Styles make fights. Just because you'd beat Young doesn't mean you'd walk through everyone who he beat.
Another thing you need to learn before pretending to be knowledgeable.

 

Considering Young had a win over prime Foreman, Lyle and arguably beat Ali, Shavers and Norton. You'd have to make him a favorite over a 41 and faded Klitschko.

 

The moron himself brought up Jimmy Young but now he's my guy. This guy is a special mental case for psychiatrists to solve.

 

Your talking out your end now ..so how does beating 41 yr old Wlad weaken the current era if Wlad beats J. Young a top 5 HW at the time in the 70's?? see how dumb you are now? SMH

i brought up young to compare to the fact wlad didnt k.o jennings ...you ACTUALLY brought up young telling me hes better than Jennings????? SIMPLETON!

 

lol...that all i needed to know..you are a true idiot thanx.wont be holding much value on you here on in.....lmao..

 

Styles make fights you ****ing moron. He could beat Young, but not Ali, Foreman, Holmes and probably Norton.

 

Aren't you the guy who said Usyk/Hunter was 50/50 and told the world about how Perez was supposed to upset Briedis?

 

I think Wlad would find a way to "jab-jab-grab" his way to a decision. But to claim Young was far less skilled than Jennings, I mean...

 

i brought up young to compare to the fact wlad didnt k.o jennings and Foreman lost to young ( you thought that won the argument bc Wlad didnt k.o jennings..lol) ...you ACTUALLY brought up young when telling me hes better than Jennings????? SIMPLETON!

 

Yeah, Wlad wouldn't KO Young either. Just because Young was better than Jennings, struggling against Jennings doesn't mean that he wouldn't beat young.

For the last time, STYLES MAKE FIGHTS. How can you claim to know boxing when you can't even comprehend with this very basic fact? You're a complete ******.

 

Nah i won money on all over rnds..yes hunter was 50/50 but Usyk won. howabout we make a MMa bet first one to get 10 wrong gets perma banned since you consider yourself some great insider? Im game..and no late changes fights are posated at direct time.? how about it all knowing ?

 

You are to dumb to realize wlad at 41 is irrelavant it shows how good Joshua is not anything about young which shows inferior guys of the 70's at least if they had to fight 6'6 giant Joshua...really you need to go back to film /footage study,you talk in circles when you cant sustain your point of opinion.

Wlad wouldnt k.o young???Yea well hate to break it to you but K.O young he would and would have far easy time than Byrd.

 

Nah. I don't do perma ban bets.... and even if I did you're not someone I'd exactly trust to hold up their end of the bargain.

 

Lol you're too dumb to realize that a 41 year old who's been boxing professionally for over 20 years and has clearly shown signs of decline in prior fights obviously isn't at his best. Delusional fanboy.

 

its not my trust its the mods isnt it you simpleton? but smart choice. lets me know if you grow some balls ??????