What does bigger PPV pacquiao-bradley or mayweather-Khan/maidana

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by ricky-fatton, Feb 19, 2014.


  1. Scar

    Scar VIP Member Full Member

    76,120
    2,760
    Jul 20, 2004
    Even though Pacquiao-Bradley II is the more meaningful fight, Mayweather vs Khan/Maidana will most definitely make more. This just goes to show and yet again prove that casuals could care less if a fight is meaningful or not.
     
  2. acie2g

    acie2g Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,738
    1,302
    Jul 21, 2010
    I respectfully have to disagree with you, Pacquiao-Bradley is meaningful because of the first fight and where Pac is in his career but Mayweather-Maidana is probably the more meaningful/entertaining fight.

    Trying to be objective yes Maidana has as good a shot as any other Welter which is none but he's a legit title holder off a big win respective to his career and comes to bring it everytime,

    While I have much respect for Pacquiao and Bradley Pacquiao hasn't fought let alone beat a top WW in 5 years and people will argue Bradley lost his last three fights in a row I think he edged Pacquiao, Provodnikov, & Marquez by SD but still.

    Now before people tear my head off about my opinion my question is this if Maidana is a bad pick because he lost to Kahn 3 years ago and Alexander 4 fights ago, what does that say about Pacquiao/Bradley who between them is arguably 1-3/0-3 respectively in the past two years with the only unquestionable win being Pacquiao over Rios