What must a fighter do to achieve this title in your eyes? All 4 Belts, Only 3 Belts, The Ring Belt? IMHO, being truthful, If you hold the WBA and WBC Belts(I don't care how crooked both organizations are) while holding the Ring Title, You are Lineal. The IBF solidifies it, while the WBO is on the same caliber as the IBO in my eyes. Please don't beat me up to much guys, just my opinion.
Undisputed is holding IBF, WBA, WBC and WBO for me. And of course the Ring would give you their belt also.
WBC,WBA ,IBF & RING ! Nothing else matters when it comes to being undisputed ! No belt that ends with O should be included !
Technically, yea, sure, all the main belts, but IMO it's really cleaning house and leaving no doubt your the man, the head honcho, the big kahuna, alpha, etc. in your division. No disputes to be made.
undisputed is a thing of the past. guys like sturm and chris john have combined for 35 or 40 title fights and until a week ago, no unification fights. the great mayweather everyone loves, 43 have tried BS, not one unified fight.... to be undisputed it was IBF, WBA, WBC.....since people give credit to the garbage WBO its happened 1 time i think...Hopkins .... now you have interim champs, WBA SUPER CHAMPIONS (haha) and i hear the WBO wants to make marco huck its first SUPER CHAMP after his next defense....
This is true, Ward would be Undisputed correct? But what about people such as Danny Garcia, who still has to fight other names?
they might can beat him in the ring one day...but they will never be as handsome! yes, sergio has been the man at 160 for a while, even the haters dont dispute that one (at least i dont think they do)
No he's not undisputed as far as I'm concerned because he clearly hasn't fought all the bests of his division. Ward has.