What Evidence Is There To Make "YOU" Believe Pacman Would Flatten Hatton?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by walk with me, Dec 15, 2008.


  1. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    38
    Jan 7, 2005
    :lol: at the people who are trying to turn the Malinaggi fight into a negative point for Hatton.:patsch
     
  2. s1nn3d

    s1nn3d Sinner Full Member

    767
    0
    Dec 6, 2008
    The evidence that you are asking for does not exist yet, Walk With Me. How can there be evidences or hard facts to base a prediction or to say the least a statement, if the two protagonists have yet to face each other? Any thing one would say at this juncture is simply speculation and can easily be refuted. Whether it comes from a casual enthusiast to a credible boxing afficionado, what they say are basically nothing more than a hunch. Not an evidence but just gut feel... at most a guess.

    Your given example itself shows the flaw to what you are asking for. You can't apply that same logic between Pac and Hatton. You can't say I believe Pac can beat Hatton or Hatton can beat Pac because one outboxed the other in their previous fight. Why? Because they never fought yet. Nor can you apply transitivity where Boxer A beats Boxer B and Boxer B beats Boxer C ergo Boxer A beats Boxer C. You can't also use statements of strengths vis a vis weaknesses to back things up. They're no solid proof as proven by Pac's recent fight with De La Hoya or by other matches that are so called "upsets." Unless the Pac and Hatton fight does transpire, the evidence you are asking for can never be satisfied.

    In the sport of boxing, one can only make an educated guess based on observations of the players to predict what might happen in their upcoming bout. Why do you think "evidences" are only used in trial cases... cause they involve past events not future ones. ;)
     
  3. Farmboxer

    Farmboxer VIP Member Full Member

    86,106
    4,096
    Jul 19, 2004
    Evidence is the video.
     
  4. nobius

    nobius 4th hokage Full Member

    872
    0
    Dec 9, 2008

    Your right
     
  5. Soriano

    Soriano Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,949
    0
    Sep 8, 2008
    ****ing idiot!!! :rofl:rofl:rofl
     
  6. enzo

    enzo Greatest Of All Time Full Member

    19,533
    1
    Feb 6, 2006

    here's your evidence... hatton flatten by pac. :yep

    This content is protected
     
  7. HyperBone

    HyperBone Silverback Gorilla Full Member

    7,152
    0
    Oct 30, 2008
    thats why threads like this are hilarious

    with pac, you cant be so sure idiots. you never learn:rofl
     
  8. asero

    asero Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,373
    309
    Jan 8, 2009

    a case of underrating pac and/or overrating a limited hatton...
     
  9. Maxime

    Maxime Sweet Science Full Member

    8,957
    109
    Jul 19, 2004
    I predict Pacquiao will knocked down Hatton twice in the first round and then knock him out cold with a single left hand in the second round.

    :yep
     
  10. digger

    digger Member Full Member

    176
    0
    Dec 8, 2008
    Ha Ha Ha:good
     
  11. artofwar

    artofwar Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,413
    0
    Dec 20, 2008

    see what happens when hate blinds you!!
     
  12. vorapsak2002

    vorapsak2002 Active Member Full Member

    1,196
    1
    Apr 14, 2009
    nostradamus
     
  13. kadyo

    kadyo Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,771
    2
    May 12, 2007
  14. s1nn3d

    s1nn3d Sinner Full Member

    767
    0
    Dec 6, 2008
  15. hmi

    hmi Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,257
    0
    Sep 14, 2007
    I like this old threads. :lol:

    Nice call, Uppercut83. So, bigmarkd86 doesn't post here anymore?