What exactly is ''the world stage''?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Arran, May 29, 2008.


  1. Arran

    Arran Boxing Junkie banned

    9,773
    3
    Jan 21, 2008
    I ask this as someone posted on another thread that Eubank never fought on the world stage, even though he fought Watson, Benn, Calzaghe etc etc
     
  2. smiffy

    smiffy Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,420
    0
    May 14, 2008
    it must be another name for america, a bit like " the world series " even though nobody else plays rounders after you get to 11 years old.
     
  3. sean

    sean pale peice of pig`s ear Full Member

    10,097
    1,094
    Jul 19, 2004
    eubank v benn had a uk tv audience of 17,000,000
    and a live gate of 40,000

    cannot get much more high profile than that.
     
  4. Grievesy

    Grievesy Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,470
    0
    Feb 16, 2008
    I think they mean that you fight the best in your division from other countries around the world( mainly America). Benn went to America and fought Barkley, DeWitt etc. whereas eubanks only fought people in the UK and Ireland.
     
  5. Arran

    Arran Boxing Junkie banned

    9,773
    3
    Jan 21, 2008
    Eubank fought lots of fights in the US early in his career.

    Does that mean RJJ never fought on the world stage?
     
  6. enzo

    enzo Greatest Of All Time Full Member

    19,533
    1
    Feb 6, 2006
    world stage is now also known as YOUTUBE.
     
  7. sean

    sean pale peice of pig`s ear Full Member

    10,097
    1,094
    Jul 19, 2004

    good desciption.
     
  8. Arran

    Arran Boxing Junkie banned

    9,773
    3
    Jan 21, 2008
    So was Pavlik V Taylor a world stage fight? 2 americans in america. What was it? 10,000 attendence? Not much ''world'' to it at all.
     
  9. Caper

    Caper How about a fair shake? banned Full Member

    10,908
    1,362
    Apr 4, 2005
    What is it with you and your obsession with the number of attendees at a given bout. What's your point? Everytime a big fight is even mentioned you go ranting on and on about how it needs to take place somewhere other than the US because the stadiums are larger or the cities are bigger...get off it already.
     
  10. Arran

    Arran Boxing Junkie banned

    9,773
    3
    Jan 21, 2008
    ok, forget the attendence, Pavlik V Taylor 2 americans fighting in america - is this the world stage? how is it more 'world stage' than Eubank V Benn in England?
     
  11. Caper

    Caper How about a fair shake? banned Full Member

    10,908
    1,362
    Apr 4, 2005
    Your basing this off the beliefs of an individual who in his own right feels Eubank vs Benn was not the world stage for his own particular reasons. Maybe he was not able to see the fight live because it did not broadcast here in the states? I pretty sure Pavlik vs Taylor II was a much more accessible fight for the Euro audience.
     
  12. Arran

    Arran Boxing Junkie banned

    9,773
    3
    Jan 21, 2008
    so a 'world-stage' fight depends on who televises it?
     
  13. ad82

    ad82 Guest

    Eubank fought in Germany, Scotland, South Africa, Ireland, United Arab Emirates and Egypt. But of course he only fought in America at the start of his carear. Poor lad never got to travel the 'world' :)
     
  14. ad82

    ad82 Guest

    Pavlik / Taylor 2 was fought in front of 7,000 people in a half empty MGM. In front of a few hundred thousand on tv. Eubank / Benn 2 had 40,000 in attendance live and 17m watching in the UK alone. It's pretty simple to work out which fight got more coverage.
     
  15. Caper

    Caper How about a fair shake? banned Full Member

    10,908
    1,362
    Apr 4, 2005
    No, I think "world-stage" depends more on the signifigance of the fight who's fighting and most importantly the fights veiwing availibility. I guess its a combonation. But yes I will admit many Americans do feel the world stage consists of taking on an American fighter on American soil. The fact that you may not recognize the US as being the optimum stage to showcase your talents for the world to see is merely your personal opinion it doent take away the fact that many people around the world still consider the US a top media source heaven for ultimate exposure. I guess its a matter of personal opinion and or preference.