As most US fights arnt aired here, we have been lucky recently getting quite a few but thats after me and many other boxing fans bombarded Sky Sports with emails telling them we would cancel our subscription if they didnt do something about it.
Yes I understand that but this goes beyond time zones as I was not able to see the fight due to its lack of availability over in the states.
The US is only one country though! The fight had a massive audience all over the world and was watched by far far more people than Pavlik / Taylor 2. To say Pavlik / Taylor 2 is on more of a global stage than Benn / Eubank 2 is crazy.
Same holds true here in the states, there has been a slight increase in the exposure of fighters such as Abraham, Calz, Hatton, Kessler over the years but still I have yet to see more than clips (or one/two fights) of Mundine, Diz, Witter, Bute, etc, etc..... Still with the recent progress of the networks the "world stage" term seems to trouble you to the point of madness....lol
Again its more of a matter of personal preference.....and of course the world is bigger than just the US but fact is the majority of fights of major signifigance are fought on US soil or by US based fighters....plus as Kirk mentioned a world title is just that a "world title" Pavlik vs Taylor II was for a world title therefore justifying the term "world stage"
2 americqan fighters fighting in america for an american organisation. Lets be honest the WBO is the only real ''world title'' the rest are pretty much american.
Well if the titles where only american then why are non americans ranked within the organizations and correct if I'm wrong but Calz seems to love to sport his "American" straps....so to be honest with you "no" the belts are pretty much open for the best man to capture and hold on to regardless of their nationalistic origin.
another nationalistic thread from a natiolistic ****.. anti american bull****, i understand a lot of people hate america but the hate here is way too much
if fighter A (an American) fought 20 people won all by Ko if fighter B (a euro) fought the same 20 people and won all by ko (in the same round) Who would be ranked higher? Ill tell you who, the American as the Euro hasnt proved himself on the ''world level'' ie the US!
That's merely your own personal view, total speculation both fighters would be viewed as top prospects nothing more nothing less. If you can give me a prime example of such a scenerio then I can place some validity on you post....if not then do us all a favor and cease perpetuation of hate.
Calzaghe V Lacy not exactly the same as above, but Lacy was the US favourite...why? He proved nothing!
Sure he was the US favourite, most any fighter that appeals to the masses would capture the support of their homeland. I for one would have liked him to win but he was outclassed and beaten to a pulp. Was Hatton the UK favorite going in against PBF?
lets not be Coy you know exactly were the world stage is in Profesional boxing. I suppose the World stage for Soccer(football) is what Yonkers? You know exactly what time it is do not feign ignorance to justify the truth.
The idea that a fighter has to fight in the United States to be seriously considered is obsolete in this age of speedy communication and international broadcasts. However, in the lightweight to heavyweight classes, most of the active fighters are Americans. In many cases, the top contenders are American and a non-American has to include their names on his fight resume to be seen internationally as a top contender or champion. Same as if he were a golfer or tennis player. This may change as world demographics change.