What exactly makes people think that Andre Ward is such a big number?

Okay I'm a big GGG fan, but GGGunbeatable if you think Froch is a bum or average then you are either very new to the sport or YDKSAB. Carl Froch is the epitome of an elite fighter, he has one of the best resumes of the last decade, an unbreakable will, an iron chin, and is tough as nails, he's as hard an out in the sport as you can possibly face.

Groves wasn't the first puncher he faced either, Kessler, Bute, Abraham and arguably Taylor and Jean Pascal are all bigger punchers than George.


And from a technical standpoint Ward is at least 2 levels above Floyd Mayweather, and if you can't take your blinders off and see that, then there is no hope for you.

And for the record Dirrell when he faced Froch was in his prime and undefeated, this is the same Dirrell barring the 2 KD's would have had a draw against James DeGale just last year. Losing or having a close match to a young Prime Dirrell is nothing to be ashamed of.

Abraham wasn't shot when Ward fought him, he'd only lost to that "bum" Carl Froch, which is nothing to be ashamed of either.

I have written at least 4 or 5 long articles hyping Golovkin, Andre Ward beats Golovkin and I say that without a doubt in my mind, stop it, you're making GGG fans look like stark raving lunatics and it reflects poorly on the rest of GGG's fans that happen to be logical.:good


And for the record I'd give Froch a 60 to 70% chance to beat GGG as well, Andre and Carl are levels above anyone Golovkin has come close to stepping in the ring with.

 

Oh shut the **** up and don't even attempt to play your ****ing childish games with me. Your agenda is obvious as it could be, you're no wizard in concealing it.

If you think Carl Froch is a no one, that means you're a flaming idiot who should probably follow another sport, why don't you educate yourself on Mikkel Kessler, Lucian Bute, and Jean Pascal **** for brains and come back to me later and tell me that. Dirrel also beat GGG in the ams, he's kind of a good boxer, and you'd know that if you had any kind of ability to understand the sport in the least.

Ward shouldn't be compared to Floyd because he's better, his skillset is far more diverse, maybe if you ever watched a Ward match then you'd know that, but you probably haven't because you're just an ignorant fanboy who loves 1 fighter and 1 fighter only, and probably doesn't follow anyone else.

 

When did I ever say that Pascal was a bum? Pascal in his prime beat Bernard Hopkins and Chad Dawson, and not a drained Chad Dawson either, the Pascal that Froch fought was a beast, and the Pascal that Kovalev fought the first time around was still very good, Kovalev shaved years off of his career though and he wasn't quite the same for the rematch.

 

Why don't you give him credit for it, it was a close fight, a draw is a draw, its better than most could achieve against BHop. Granted without the KD he'd have lost, but it was a good performance regardless.

 

I was typing so fast I ****ed up, I didn't even realize I did that. Whoops. And I do too, but he did well. A hell of a lot better than Pavlik, Winky and Milk Dud did.:deal