What fighters do you rate better than Mayweather Jnr of the modern era

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Zulu Jungle, May 3, 2010.


  1. Diablo

    Diablo Active Member Full Member

    1,365
    0
    Nov 23, 2007
    [ame]www.youtube.com/watch?v=yjTHLPmfBCQ[/ame]
     
  2. paddycfc

    paddycfc Active Member Full Member

    819
    1
    Oct 29, 2009
    ya right defo leonard but hearns fought on for ages leonard finished in the 80s
     
  3. brucebufershair

    brucebufershair Active Member Full Member

    876
    1
    Apr 7, 2010
    cant help but think that Pernell Whitaker deserves a bitter song than Limp Bizkit
     
  4. Redondo5

    Redondo5 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,703
    16
    Nov 11, 2007
    all of those except benitez and pacman... mayweather should rate higher than them
     
  5. threethirteen

    threethirteen Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,366
    1
    Jan 24, 2009
  6. threethirteen

    threethirteen Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,366
    1
    Jan 24, 2009
    You can watch tape that shows the erosion of the skills compared to years gone by. Heavyweight is a great example of that. What a nonsense statement you made.
     
  7. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,423
    1,447
    Sep 7, 2008
    Fighters I have higher in my alltime list (Floyd is at about 75 following the win over Shane, who was past prime, but Floyd showed his adaptability and that he didn't need to 'run' to win, thus improving my respect for him)

    -Sweet Pea
    -Hagler
    -Hearns
    -Pac
    -Mike Spinks
    -Mike McCallum
    -Roy Jones
    -Duran (did a lot of great work in the 70's as well though)
    -Leonard
    -Julio Cesar Chavez
    -Arguello (again did his best work in the 70's arguably)

    It's better to rank fighters once they've retired IMO though. With a win over Pac (a non controversial one) Floyd could climb as many as 50 places on my list. He still needs to prove himself IMO; Shane was not sharp, and his punch resistance has clearly dwindled.

    Floyd can take a decent shot though; the two right hands that wobbled him early were pinpoint.

    All the above fighters have as good/better levels of ability IMO, despite all their different styles. Floyds speed and reflexes are quite unreal even at 147 though, although he ISN'T DEFENSIVELY INFALLIBLE!!!!
     
  8. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,423
    1,447
    Sep 7, 2008
    Why? Because he shouldn't.
     
  9. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,423
    1,447
    Sep 7, 2008
    Still, wins over Toney, Hopkins (pre-prime) McCallum (post-prime but still very good) and Virgil Hill (got destroyed, arguably 'the man' at light heavy for some time) give him a fairly lofty ranking. I have him at no.45 currently
     
  10. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,423
    1,447
    Sep 7, 2008
    No chance:lol:
     
  11. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,423
    1,447
    Sep 7, 2008
    :dealNo.67 in my current rankings
     
  12. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,423
    1,447
    Sep 7, 2008

    Even worse resume than Floyds.
     
  13. Zulu Jungle

    Zulu Jungle Guest

    Mike Macallum is underrated.

    Sparked out Don Curry.

    Stopped Milton McCory.

    Beat up Michael Watson.

    Very good fighter the bodysnatcher.
     
  14. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    36
    Jan 7, 2005
    Why would the number matter? Its who he beat to get there.
     
  15. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    46,399
    15
    Jan 9, 2008
    I think the lower end of the top 50 is about right.

    I'm not a fan of Toney at all, between the Jones loss and Jirov win his record is shockingly bad, only a couple of decent wins in there, the rest are an assortment of bus drivers, plasterers and school teachers.

    I'd say all things considered Hill is perhaps his best win :think