What Fighter's Downfall Saddened You The Most?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by salsanchezfan, May 17, 2008.


  1. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,744
    100
    Nov 8, 2004
    If there was a smaller fighter good enough, why wouldn't they trouble him? You don't think if there was a Roy Jones or James Toney around during the time they wouldn't have troubled him? Maybe Hagler wouldn't. He never moved up so we wouldn't know.

    Maybe if Spinks was quite past his prime and couldn't punch to knock him out, Hagler might have been enticed to take Spinks on too.

    I wouldn't debate it.

    Yeah it was a better win (but by a point on my card). That said, Hagler was a lot more convincing in his best wins imo, even though they may not have been as good at the weight class.

    Hearns was p4p too, as was Leonard after their fight, and as was Antoufermo as well. It's not as if Hagler didn't face p4p guys.
     
  2. RafaelGonzal

    RafaelGonzal Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,843
    13
    Mar 7, 2006
    Hector Camacho who although he ended up with a decent career basically blew it. He could have been so much more and had this guy been a great sportsman, no way Chavez would have ever beaten him ever, its a testament to a gifted performer blowing his potential and being surpassed by one with grit and a smaller set of gifts.
     
  3. Bigcat

    Bigcat Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,545
    101
    Jan 10, 2006
    Listons fall against Leotis Martin was so sad to watch...
     
  4. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    71,996
    28,006
    Feb 15, 2006
    For me Joe Louis against Rocky Marciano.

    He retired, he wanted to stay retired, he came back for the IRS, and only pride was keeping him up in that fight.
     
  5. punchy

    punchy Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,801
    10
    Oct 10, 2005
    Joe Louis unlike most he didn't bring it on himself by being stupid or a dickhead.
     
  6. Imira

    Imira Vespertine... Full Member

    102
    4
    Dec 19, 2004
    Watching Ali beat up Floyd Patterson in the second fight. I don't even watch that one anymore...
     
  7. pugilistspecialist

    pugilistspecialist Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,966
    8
    Jul 19, 2004
    Muhammad Ali's..........It became apparent after the fight with Foreman and the last fight of Frazier in 1975 Ali begin to decline severly. Ended his career trading wins with mediocre Leon Spinks, was dominated by Larry Holmes(the saddest fight I ever watched) and lost to Trevor Berbick in his last horray
     
  8. Rebel-INS

    Rebel-INS Mighty Healthy Full Member

    2,489
    4
    Apr 12, 2008
    Probably Tyson. I haven't watched the Mcbride fight, and I probably never will.
     
  9. Club Fighter

    Club Fighter Boxing Addict banned

    4,329
    1
    Oct 12, 2005
    I'd have to say Taylor cuz he never really got to ascend to the heights and status that his gifts would have led one to believe he would.
     
  10. Sister Sledge

    Sister Sledge Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,129
    34
    Jul 24, 2004
    Spinks did the right thing. It's sad that he's not regarded higher, because he had some amazing achievements. He was unbeatable in the most competive Light Heavyweight era ever. The Eddie Davis fight was close, but Davis was also a very tough fighter who game many a champion trouble.
    Beating a faded Holmes is much better than beating John Ruiz.
    The Tyson fight is how Spinks is remembered, however, which is unfortunate. It always sad when a man who has had so many success stories is remebered for his one failure. It's ironic, because he wasn't expected to win anyway.
     
  11. salsanchezfan

    salsanchezfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,991
    11,862
    Aug 22, 2004

    ................Just goes to show how few "fans" bother to look under the surface of anything. YOu can spot them right away, though, when they give Tyson full credit for the victory. Spinks was never a heavyweight, regardless of what the scales said. In my mind, this makes him an even greater fighter for his achievements.
     
  12. Sister Sledge

    Sister Sledge Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,129
    34
    Jul 24, 2004
    True. I don't think Spinks would have done well against any of the top Heavyweights at that time. He just wasn't a Heavyweight. It's a testament to him that he acually got a few kayo's in the division. I would have love for him to move to Cruiserweight before he went to heavyweight.
     
  13. brownpimp88

    brownpimp88 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,378
    10
    Feb 26, 2007
    By the way, this is how i think Spinks does against those mid 80s heavyweights.

    Tucker- loses ud
    Dokes- wins by ud
    Tubbs- loses, tubbs is too big and skilled for him.
    Berbick- win
    Carl Williams- win
    Greg Page- win by tko
    Tim Witherspoon- loses by ud
    Pinklon Thomas- 50/50 fight
    Coetzee- win by ko
    Bonecrusher- win by ud
    Weaver- win by ud

    This doesn't even include the fact that he could have made a serious run at cruiserweight by fighting Holyfield, rematching Qawi and fighting Carlos De Leon. Michael Spinks could have given himself an Archie Moore level resume. I guess the fire wasn't there.
     
  14. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    405
    Jun 14, 2006
    Which is precisely why Spinks could have never reached those heights. There's more to a fighter than skill, they have to have the determination, heart, and courage to go with it and unfortunately for Michael, he was scared going into his fight with Tyson. Ali and Liston was an exact replica of the same situation, but whereas Ali was able to overcome his fear, Michael Spinks just froze and got knocked out. Spinks had the skillset to be better than he ended up being, but he lacked courage.

    The most saddening downfall of a fighter for me is Muhammad Ali. Watching somebody of his ability and importance to the sport go out on his shield was both humbling and sad.

    The downfall of Barrera wasn't all that bad because he was competitive with Juan Manuel Marquez, and just proved that he could survive against the younger and hungrier Manny Pacquiao. I hope he stays retired, but if he doesn't, I'll support him through thick and thin.

    Sugar Ray Leonard's downfall was awful. Some uneducated fool said earlier that he wasn't shot when he lost to both Norris and Camacho, but anybody who's seen Leonard's fights with Benitez, Hearns, and Hagler know that was not the Sugar Man. He would made short work of both Camacho and Norris had it been 10 years earlier, so to watch him get knocked out by Camacho, who wasn't a big puncher, was terrible.

    Joe Louis getting knocked out cold by Marciano was bad, as was Mike Tyson's loss to Mcbride. Can you imagine what Tyson would have done to that guy in '88? Would have been a massacre.
     
  15. salsanchezfan

    salsanchezfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,991
    11,862
    Aug 22, 2004

    .............Rooster doesn't actually believe that Leonard was in his prime, he just says a lot of stuff here merely to get a rise out of folks. It works. :lol: He must sit at his keyboard and laugh for hours.

    All in all though........I actually like that he's here, and I'm not being sarcastic. He can be a fun read when you're in the mood for that kind of thing. It's just that people here seem to take him SOOOOO seriously.