Foster was different fighter with different style and different approach than Peter. Just because Peter couldn't stop someone doesn't mean that Foster wouldn't either. This is what I meant, I didn't imply that you called Peter better fighter than Foster.
But you said that i was comparing him with Foster... And i did not. No problem i see your point.and i never debated it. My point is valid and must be taken in count, although hitting power alone is not everything, obviously you need some speed, accuracy, skills and timing to make it effective. BUT !!I doubt that Peter had only power.
I understand, I could use different words although I don't think it was clear that I said that. Peter wasn't bad, but he was a slugger with little finesse behind him.