What Floyd has done in his entire career...

:deal

 

It was a great win.

But answer me this, cause you failed to previously.

With Morales and Barrera being ranked pretty much the same on an ATG ranking scale, why is Pac's win over Barrera in their first fight ranked so much higher than Pacs wins over Morales?

 

raheem over morales, boxed to a decision a morales who missed the catchweight of 133 and looks like uninspired and uninterested for the fight.

pac over morales, first one to stop the iron chinned morales who is more inspired this time and was never been stopped by any other boxer until now.

yeah it's so overrated...

 

Answer?

 

i never said that it's better than his barrera win but it's one of his top wins.

 

Who did Morales beat above 130?:think

:deal

 

He was motivated just past his best against Raheem and even more past it against Pac. Decent win but not an ATG win like you *******s make it out to be.

 

1. maybe not prime, but not shot

2. who did he beat above 130?

3. Do you think Pacquiao was prime in his first fight with Morales?

 

Name wise, I'd agree.

But Pac has a number of great wins.

It'd be hard to put it in his top 5, imo.

 

:good

 

Answer ?

 

Getting schooled by a guy named Raheem and then being weight drained and losing before retiring after many years in boxing and a large number of wars doesn't help your argument, I'm sorry.

But why all this bicker and banter.

They are great wins.

Just not the standard that some over zealous Pac fans think.

Pac has many great wins, and the Morales wins would fall outside a large number of those.

It's more the name that makes them great wins.

 

See above.

 

Pac got great resume but everyone of his great wins are against worn out fighters. Cotto and Clottey was not but clottey was not great.

 

motivated for the raheem fight? he didn't even trained properly for that fight after winning against pacquiao in the first fight. morales looked uninspired that he even missed the 133 catchweight for that fight.