What GGG/Jacobs & Ward/Kovalev taught us about GGG/Ward

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by NewBoxingOrder, Jun 18, 2017.


  1. NewBoxingOrder

    NewBoxingOrder Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,984
    1,821
    Oct 13, 2008

    And, he has never shown any vulnerability during a real pro or amateur bout, unlike Kovalev.

    I guess that's the difference, then.

    Kovalev is a heck of a fighter, as is Ward.

    But neither one is Golovkin. Which seems to be the conclusion Boone also reached.
     
  2. FuMaster

    FuMaster Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,904
    1,061
    Jun 10, 2016
    Tell GGG to step up and let's see the fight. Dare to be great!
     
  3. purephase

    purephase Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,740
    89
    Jan 14, 2011
    You can't have it both ways. Does sparring count or not? If it doesn't, then Ward was the first one to demonstrate Kovalev's vulnerability to the body. If it does, then Golovkin actually does have his own weakness to the body.
     
  4. NewBoxingOrder

    NewBoxingOrder Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,984
    1,821
    Oct 13, 2008

    Hmmm. Interesting.

    I'd rather go life and death with Jacobs than Boone. Especially when Boone knocked me down.

    Anyone who went life and death with Boone is not beating Golovkin.
     
  5. NewBoxingOrder

    NewBoxingOrder Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,984
    1,821
    Oct 13, 2008

    There is no "both ways.

    - Kovalev has shown weakness with punch resistance in real bouts in the past

    - GGG has shown no weakness with punch resistance in real bouts in the past

    Again, it's just not there. As I said above, thinking someone is going to hurt GGG in a fight is like expecting Vitali is going to get hurt in a fight. It's almost certainly not going to happen. Particularly against a feather-fisted foe like Ward.

    And to be honest, Golovkin has never been hurt even to the extent that Sanders and Lewis dinged Vitali.

    Anyone who goes into a GGG fight thinking they are going to win a power/chin match-up is headed for a loss.

    Ward's lack of power would likely be his downfall against GGG.
     
  6. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    60,066
    22,117
    Jul 21, 2012
    This muppet thinks Vitali Klitschko is the greatest HW that ever lived. GGG has haters because of clowns like him.

    Kovalev would drive a right hand straight through Golovkins head. Ain't no MW can handle that power. Put Kovalev in against another contender at 175 and he goes straight back to being the monster he was before he met Ward.
     
  7. NewBoxingOrder

    NewBoxingOrder Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,984
    1,821
    Oct 13, 2008
    ^ Just so other readers know, I do not and will not respond to dinovelvet. So do not expect a response from me now to him. I don't have time for those with poor-to-marginal boxing knowledge.
     
  8. purephase

    purephase Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,740
    89
    Jan 14, 2011
    You've moved the goalposts from weakness to the body to general vulnerability because continuing to focus on the former forces you to either concede that Ward demonstrated something in an area where a fighter was previously seen as invulnerable or concede that Golovkin himself has demonstrable weakness to the body. Kovalev, who like Golovkin, had never been seen as weak to the body in actual bouts, suddenly appeared weak to the body when in with Andre Ward. No reason to believe that Golovkin himself might also suddenly demonstrate such a vulnerability in a fight (one that's barely worth discussing anyway since Golovkin and his team have no interest in it).
     
  9. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    60,066
    22,117
    Jul 21, 2012
    Translation = ive been schooled by this guy too many times and i never want to go back there again.
     
  10. NewBoxingOrder

    NewBoxingOrder Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,984
    1,821
    Oct 13, 2008

    So let's try this again, as you seem to be struggling to grasp the concepts involved here:


    - My analysis is that Ward's lack of power combined with GGG's excellent punch resistance is a major reason why GGG beats Ward

    - You seem to be suggesting that Ward hurt Kovalev to the body, and thus he might hurt GGG similarly. I guess this is your thinking


    So, it would seem that you're trying to make some kind of statement that Ward could potentially hurt GGG. Despite all apparent evidence from both of their careers going against such a conclusion.

    No one has ever been able to make any headway against Golovkin as regards hurting him. Including harder punchers than Ward. Like Jacobs. Or Lemeiux.

    There is no reason to think that changes with Ward. Even if you think Ward hurt Kovalev to the body in a way no one else ever had.

    And, as I pointed out, the reason for this is that GGG has never shown any weakness to any kind of punches in any sanctioned bout. Unlike Kovalev. Kovalev has shown vulnerability in previous fights. GGG has not shown that.

    So, if Ward made a gameplan to try and beat GGG and that gameplan were predicated on being able to hurt GGG, then I'd say GGG wins such a possible match-up 999 out of 1000 times.

    There could be a gameplan for Ward to beat GGG. But going into a fight thinking you're going to be able to hurt GGG isn't that gameplan.

    If Ward tried to hurt GGG in a bout, if he committed to that (got in the pocket and exchanged, sat down on his punches, etc), he would be stopped. I can't see any other realistic outcome.
     
    Last edited: Jun 18, 2017
  11. purephase

    purephase Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,740
    89
    Jan 14, 2011
    You really didn't have to waste the time rewriting all the same assertions (assertions not arguments) you made the first time around.

    Again, no one at the higher division Kovalev's been competing at had ever made any headway into his body specifically until Ward. Your entire argument is predicated on Ward having weak power and Golovkin having literally no weaknesses. If you're honestly evaluating last night's fight in lieu of your priors, it seems the former premise may need some revising. And declaring that Kovalev has always been weak to the body doesn't work to maintain the idea that Ward has weak power, as it has never been demonstrated across any of his real fights in the pros. Thus you simply have to conclude that Ward may have greater power than you originally assumed or that fighters can display vulnerabilities that weren't evident across their preceding fights.
     
  12. NewBoxingOrder

    NewBoxingOrder Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,984
    1,821
    Oct 13, 2008

    As I said above, if Ward came into a fight with GGG thinking he could hurt him, there is no way he wins the fight. That's fantastical thinking, magical thinking.

    I could make a gameplan to try to beat Vitali Klitschko. The gameplan would not involve me believing I am going to be able to seriously hurt him. That's a suicide mission that is likely to get me KO'd.

    If a fight becomes something of a shoot-out, with both guys looking for power shots on the other, then I'm obviously going to go with the guy who has dropped or stopped every person he ever fought in 12-round fights as compared with the guy who was dropped by Darnell Boone.

    It's a no-brainer.

    This all comes back to why the match-up against GGG is a bad one for Ward. How do you, as an inside fighter, overcome someone who can't be hurt and who has devastating power?

    And my conclusion is the same as Boone's: You don't.

    As I have said many times before on the forum, Ward IS a great fighter. But he has certain limitations that don't lend themselves to victory in certain match-ups. One such match-up is Calzaghe, and another is Golovkin.
     
  13. purephase

    purephase Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,740
    89
    Jan 14, 2011
    This exact same diatribe about Ward being unable to win any kind of shootout against Golovkin could have easily been written about Kovalev at any point prior to last night. And yet Ward did in fact manage to hurt him and win via stoppage, rather than having to follow a gameplan that would have involved going for the decision.
     
  14. NewBoxingOrder

    NewBoxingOrder Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,984
    1,821
    Oct 13, 2008
    ^ False.

    I believe Ward himself felt that he hurt Kovalev to the body in their first fight. So that would have given Ward some hope heading into the second fight.

    Needless to say, such 'evidence' doesn't exist for Ward going into a possible GGG fight. There is no reason to believe, for any fighter, that they are going to be able to hurt GGG in a bout. It doesn't exist.

    To repeat -- bad match up for Ward. Not that Ward isn't a great fighter, just the wrong match up for him. At least when both fighters were/are in their primes.
     
  15. purephase

    purephase Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,740
    89
    Jan 14, 2011
    As I said earlier you could have just confined your entire discussion to "Golovkin literally has no weaknesses." This is also why Anthony Joshua would have little chance IMO.

    Also, what's this take Golovkin's record to in terms of "theoretical victories," as his team has clearly never fancied this fight at any point despite what a terrible, horrendous match-up it is for Ward?