I have been doing quite a bit of rereading about the Johnson Jeffries fight. Adam's Johnson Vol. 2 in itself is an outstanding body of work as a whole as well as specifically about this fight. I have devoured pretty much everything I could get my hands on regarding the topic. It is a fascinating sociological study of a period in American history. My main issue here is what happened to Jeffries that day ? We know the givens. Inactivity. Smoking. Drinking. Excess weight. What we also should know is that the man took over a year to get prepared. Working out, sparring to some degree, tons of road work. The weight came off over a year and he was close to his fight weight for months before the actual battle so this was no two to three month crash weight loss .. By all accounts Jeffries looked from good to outstanding in the weeks up to the bout. He had stamina, he had speed, he had strength. While he clearly cound not be close to the man he was six years earlier he still should have had more initial snap to him than the near Ali vs Holmes like performance he put up. Jeffries went on to write later on that he was drugged, ect .. while that may have been I'd say a more likely scenario was if the combination of how drying out extensively before the fight as was the custom at the time combined with the altitude that he really did not have that must time to acclimate to impact him significantly ? While Johnson may have sent thru the same he was a younger, active athlete. This may have been a big part of why Jeff looked so slow and weak out of the gate. I have no idea who would have won between these two prime for prime. I am a huge Johnson fan and find him fascinating but the Hart fight always gives me doubts, not that he lost a decision he should have been awarded but how Marvin Hart was that competitive in the first place against a physically prime, motivated Johnson. Yes Jack may have been robbed but it why was it even competitive ? Jeffries in his prime was a beast. Very strong, terrific stamina, iron chin, very big puncher when his hands were not injured, pretty clever and under rated speed. Even a shell of this fighter, well trained for a year should have shown better in Reno. Any thoughts ?
I think part of it was that Jeffries just didn't have a style that'd age well, too much reliance on his physical gifts. Drying out is an interesting idea, but I've never really seen evidence for it really making you perform worse, even though that's the current accepted wisdom. (I don't imagine it'll be good for you though). If he never believed he could really win that could have made him perform worse. I'll need to rewatch it though. I think it's not impossible for the reports on Jeffries' condition were flattering to hype up his chances, or over optimistic by people who just wanted him to win. How often is there newspaper reports before a big fight saying one of them is a mess?
I appreciate your point but it is documented by dozens of different coverages over a year plus period that the man was training hard, that he looked good, that he had some speed and power back. My issue is not that he lost but how he looked horrific pretty much from the opening round and if that last stage of drying out and altitude took whatever edge he had off ..
Didn’t Choyniski say he looked awful in sparring? His coordination was off? Either way being fit and fighting fit are two different things. The man was out of the ring for 6 years and took on the top heavy of the day without so much as a tune up. Fight had big loss written all over it if people of the day weren’t so blinded to see Jack lose.
Great point! There is a difference between being fit and fighting fit! Yes! Being fit does not mean the same as being fit to fight! Brilliant!
I too have rad endlessly of the entire era. Johnson was just SOOOO great, no heavyweight in history is taking 6 yrs off and beating him. Jeez, at his very best, maybe no super in shaped trained heavyweight of any time beats Papa Jack, which btw is my fav book about this subject. Roberts reports of Jacks fights are art themselves.
You've read Pollack's account. Choynski felt Jeffries suffered mental collapse. Corbett that he handicapped himself by not sparring more. Langford said he was in good condition ,otherwise he would never have been able to absorb the punches he did. Jeffries had 18 months to get down to weight and was 230lbs in October 1909 8 months before the fight . No doubt it would have been a different fight had both been prime.I think Johnson would have won ,but it would not have been the one - sided drubbing it turned out to be.A Jeffries fanatic here states it was level after 10 rounds.In truth Jeffries was outclassed and out manned. The round by round account is available.
There are at least if not more reports from Choynski, Corbett, Muldoon and others who saw Jeffries time and again spatter that say he looked and fought terrific. Choynski said he fought both, he was sparring with Jeffries and he picked Jeffries to win by KO before seven rounds.
Pollacks account is not his , it is a wide scale, footnoted series of first hand coverage by the newspaper writers covering the fighter's training who saw the sparring live as well as the men sparring with him.
He was so great that at age 28, well prepared in a high profile bout he went a very challenging twenty rounds with Marvin Hart ?
I'd need to have another look at the reports, but I thought it was just a pretty lackluster performance from Johnson, who let Hart lead.
To keep it simple he was afraid especially to lose in front of people......fighting in front of crowds is no small thing especially when you think you are going to get beat up and look inadequate He had to carry a lot of societies weight into the ring he had never done that before that is a ton of pressure
To me it seems Likely Choyniski would pick Jeffries since he ko’d Johnson and fought to a lucky draw with Jeffries. As for Corbett an out and out racist him picking Jeff was more a product of wish fulfillment than actual objective analysis one would think. And I fear the same probably held true for many that were picking Jeffries. Not many people are going to give honest assessment to the media regarding the fighter in their camp and I think most reporters of this era probably didn’t have the eye to even know what to look for. Tyson looked great post prison physique wise but was never close to the fighter he was pre prison and he was both younger and gone for half the time Jeffries was, when he returned. I find it amazing Jeff lasted as long as he did that day. 110 degree heat, first fight in six years with an opponent hell bent on kicking his butt. I know Johnson could of removed him sooner but that was not his style, still Jeff amazes me to go that long absorbing what he did and the pressure he faced carrying the hopes of so many ppl
Bingo- that was a point I was alluding to at the end of my post as well. This was a whole new ballgame for Jeff. It’s one thing to be confident in your abilities in you athletic prime involved in a sporting contest. Another to have the build up of society for years trying to find a savior. To have it thrown at your feet when all else failed in this monumental event of a fight. The pressure on this guy was enormous he probably even froze up in the bout some.