I think pac fans are all spun up by the fact he looked fast against rios and algieri....but if pac fans rewatch the bradley fights, they will find that pac and bradley are actually about the same in terms of hand speed. pac may be a little faster, but the difference is not has huge as with rios. Also, look at the marquez fights...marquez is a pretty slow guy, but he's still able to catch pac with punches from the outside and drop him twice in the last fight and beat pac's a88 bad the fight before that. i'm not just basing it offa one fight or fighter...just saying, pac's hand speed is not that amazing anymore if it once was...also, his defense is suspect...he might try a maidana and just try and overwhelm floyd with activity...but his stamina isn't that great either....he'd be winded by the 6th round and an easy target for floyd... i don't know, fellas...i just don't see a way out for pac. he's just gotta hope for a lucky punch.
Eveyone talking about Pac, what about Floyd then? All he does is shoulder rolling with his "Omagad why u try to hit me? " face and try to find an opening to not throw a punch but to score a point. That will simply not work against Pac. There's a reason why Floyd never fought Bradley but fought Maidana twice when a rematch was really not necessary or expected.
Lol he fought Maidana again because of all the casual fans and Floyd haters saying he lost the fight. If he didn't fight Maidana again most of the Floyd haters would be on here talking about how he ran scared of Maidana when in reality he won the first fight. Look at the "Will Manny get jobbed thread" and see all the Floyd haters saying he lost. It's ridiculous he clearly won and while Maidana did have some success and won some rounds that's all he did do he didn't win the majority of rounds like they push. In reality both Manny and Floyd are past their best it's irrefutable. The problem on the forum is that Manny fans are only highlighting Manny being past it and Floyd fans are only highlighting Floyd being past it.
that's the nature of haterism....floyd won the first maidana fight 9-3 or possilbly 10-2 on my card and on cards of thre judges who actuallyh saw the fight. but because SOMEBODY SOMEWHERE who dksab said it was a close fight or some schit like that, the haters jumped on the bandwagon talking about "clearly floyd struggled with maidana" or "it was an even fight" or some equally bogus schit...it was NEVER a struggle for floyd...through both fights he dominated maidana with relative ease...the second time more clearly because he couldn't afford to lose ONE round so it was like 12-0...because if he lost ONE round they would say "maidana got robbed!..."
floyd won the first maidana fight 9-3 or possilbly 10-2 on my card and on cards of thre judges who actuallyh saw the fight.[/quote] The three judges were obviously corrupt & you do not know how to score a fight:good
eh...I don't know if that's why he fought Maidana again. I don't think he cares even a little bit if some idiot fans thought he lost the first fight and I doubt he peruses these (or any) message boards. Wasn't Maidana 2 fought because they were running out of time to pick an opponent and the first fight was slightly more competitive than people thought? Then something about Khan not being able to fight in September (ramadan I guess?).
