It's fact, so YOU need to keep telling yourself whatever it is that you believe. THe referee ruled a slip because that's EXACTLy what it was.
I did, plenty of times. There was no knockdown to be had, it was Nichols throwing a check jab, which landed as Wilder was slipping. Thus, no official knockdown, it was a clear slip lol .
No it ain't, he was already close to being on the floor due to a slip. That is NOT a knockdown when the cause of the drop was due to being off balanced/slipping. It is ONLY a knockdown when the cause of the dropped fighter was due to a punch being landed.
I have far far more knowledge of the fight game than YOU do, thank you very much! It's a fact, just saying. It was a clear slip, even the referee deduced that instantaneously.
It is true, he was ahead in the scorecards had the fight been finished in the 10th with the knockdowns counting. Fact of the matter is, Wilder was winning b4 the stoppage (Points wise) Thank you for agreeing with me!!!
How can you keep being so wrong? You justified the judges scorecards by claiming they were a result of the knockdowns in round 10.... Wrong.
It's undeniable that he was winning on points if we consider the totality of the fight, yes it is true. They only showed up to the conclusion of R9. Had R10 been a factor, then yes the fight was in favour of Deontay Wilder (Points) Just because you don't know boxing doesn't mean it's not a fact, sir. Maybe instead of trolling, you learn how to score a fight. However, this is ALL irrelevant as Wilder took it out of the judges hands and knocked him out. I bet you thought Ortiz would win.