What if John L Sullivan had fallen under the wheels of a hansom cab?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by janitor, Sep 4, 2025 at 1:57 PM.


  1. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,541
    27,161
    Feb 15, 2006
    So in this timeline a young pugilist named John L Sullivan is eliminated from the timeline after he has signed to fight Paddy Ryan.

    He never wins the title, or unifies the various title claims under bare knuckle and Queensbury rules.

    How does the timeline change?

    Which fighters are able to exploit the vacuum that he leaves behind?

    Does Queensbury boxing even come to dominate the sport?

    Give me your thoughts.
     
    Last edited: Sep 4, 2025 at 2:30 PM
  2. Melankomas

    Melankomas Prime Jeffries would demolish a grizzly in 2 Full Member

    6,865
    8,516
    Dec 18, 2022
    So he’s just thanos snapped out of existence before the Ryan fight? Does anyone investigate this?
     
  3. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,541
    27,161
    Feb 15, 2006
    As the thread title says, he falls under the wheels of a hansom cab.

    The inquest concludes that it was death my misadventure.

    Only a few bare knuckle boxing anoraks speculate that he might have changed the timeline today.
     
  4. mattdonnellon

    mattdonnellon Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,612
    1,876
    Dec 2, 2006
    Queensbury Rules already had the momentum, Mace and Foley had sown the seeds, top fighters Dwyer, Miller, Goss, Ryan himself were embracing them. In Australia Farnan, Foley, Hicken, Miller, Newton were sparring regularly with gloves, England was moving slower to be sure and it was into the 1890's before gloves superseded bare-knuckle for title fights but the pages of the sports papers were listing hundreds of glove contest every week. The law too had closed in more. As for who would have emerged, that's a great question. Kilrain and Mitchell probably as LPR would have held sway for longer and both could transfer seamlessly to the MOQ rules, I think. Maybe Burke and Godfrey too, if he got fair play, but that is unlikely. Jackson, Slavin or Goddard would take over circa 1889 and after that Corbett would be a factor.
     
    The Long Count likes this.
  5. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,541
    27,161
    Feb 15, 2006
    I am not sure that I entirely agree.

    Despite the increase on gloved boxing, many people refused to accept it as being legitimate, including the National Police Gazette.

    Sullivan unifying the titles, was a major factor in gloved boxing taking over.

    Even if I am wrong, there was clearly no fighter who was going to emerge as a dominant champion.

    Where does that leave us?
     
    mattdonnellon likes this.
  6. Melankomas

    Melankomas Prime Jeffries would demolish a grizzly in 2 Full Member

    6,865
    8,516
    Dec 18, 2022
    Sullivan was pivotal into making gloved boxing mainstream though, even before he beat Ryan for the title he was the biggest star in boxing. Instead of seeing dudes have a 5 hour long staring contest for 90 rounds you can see John L. knock dudes out in 2 minutes. Not to mention that boisterous charisma that carried his stardom as much as it did Ali’s in the 60s-70s, alongside the combination of an exciting, unique style that only gloved boxing could bring. Without Sullivan, boxing wouldn’t be nearly as culturally relevant as it became or is now. Maybe someone like Corbett could’ve turned the sport mainstream due to his own unique style and personality but would there have even been a Jim Corbett without John L. Sullivan? So much would change.
     
    mattdonnellon likes this.
  7. GlaukosTheHammer

    GlaukosTheHammer Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,983
    2,181
    Nov 7, 2017
    Yeah, John's a figure head not the money. John L didn't really give a ****.