What if Johnson and Jeffries

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by psychoshane, Dec 1, 2010.


  1. psychoshane

    psychoshane Active Member Full Member

    557
    0
    Nov 16, 2010
    Had fought in Jeffs prime. WHen he was champion Jeffries wouldn't give Johnson a title shot because while while there were black champions in the lighter classes such as Joe Gans and Joe Walcott, it had been decided the more prestigous heavyweight title was off limits to blacks, Johnson would have to wait a few years for Tommy Burns to become champion. Johnson, who was a good trash talker taunted Burns calling him a coward until Burns agred to fight him. It was a mismatch from the begining. Johnson was not only a better boxer than Burns he was seven inches taller and outweighed Burns by 20 pounds on fight night. Burns was brutally punished by Johnson who toyed with him before finally knocking him out.
    Then when Americans were screaming for a great white hope Jeffries was brought out of retirement to take the title back from Johnson. The highly touted fight was a mismatch because Jeffries hadn't fought in 5 years by then and was very rusty and out of shape.
    But if Jeffs had given Johnson a title shot? Would it have been the same fight against a prime Jeffries?
     
  2. Swarmer

    Swarmer Patrick Full Member

    19,654
    52
    Jan 19, 2010
    I still think he woulda probably embarassed him. Johnson was just on a whole new level as far as skillset, AND he had the athleticism necessary to compete against Jeff.
     
  3. Johnstown

    Johnstown Boxing Addict banned

    5,695
    12
    Aug 30, 2010
    yea..that whole grabbing guys behind the head...guys like burns and ketchel, guys who you outweight and outsize,,,and then uppercutting them while holding..yea..amazing skills....
     
  4. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,589
    27,253
    Feb 15, 2006
    I think there is a verry good chance that Jeffries would have won.

    Jeffries in his prime was a murderous body puncher, and he aplied pressure proactivley, instead of fighting reactivley. Also, the Hart fight shows that Johnson was by no meanbs unbeatable at this stage.
     
  5. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,122
    Jun 2, 2006
    How about prime for prime?
     
  6. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    I think in 1904/05 Jeff takes it.

    A prime for prime matchup would end up beeing an endurance and durability test for both. Johnson is more skilled, especially defensivly, but I give Jeff the edge in durability. Endurance is a toss up. Will give Johnson´s chin in? At his ebst, I doubt it. Neither does Jeffries. It will go on till some one is too tired to continue and somehow I think this will be Johnson, perhaps a bit similar to the Willard fight but much more competative up to that point.
     
  7. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,151
    8,625
    Jul 17, 2009
    Prime for prime,Johnson would still have beaten Jeffries. He was on a different planet,skillwise. It would have obviously been more of a fight though.
     
  8. Swarmer

    Swarmer Patrick Full Member

    19,654
    52
    Jan 19, 2010
    If all you see in Johnson is his skirting of the rules on the inside then you probably shouldn't think too highly of Ali, Hops, Duran, and countless other people branded as the GOAT.

    I think Johnson's outside game would make this a lot less competitive than it seems. JJ had science equivalent or better than Corbett, who also made Jeff suffer in similar fashion...
     
  9. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    And in how many fights did Johnson fight from the outside? Both fighter were more comfortable in the closer ranges. Yes, when it´s on the outside Johnson is at an advantage. On the other hand Hart gave Johnson problems with making him work a lot and keeping the pressure high. Jeff would do the same. Both fighters are on the same level IMO.
     
  10. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,440
    9,427
    Jul 15, 2008
    I am starting to believe that the Jeffries of the second Corbett and Ruhlin fights tears Johnson up. If Jack had his hands full with Hart, robbed or not, Jeffries who was so much stronger, tougher, harder hitting with terrific stamina, good speed and an iron chin would have been hell for him ...
     
  11. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    Isnt the Hart fight pretty controversal though, something on the lines of Johnson had to dominate to win?

    I don't think Jeffries can win, on the inside Johnson was the stronger and better grappler. On the outside Johnson is more skilled. On Jeffries side is the fact Johnson wouldnt be as big/strong as he would become in time
     
  12. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,122
    Jun 2, 2006
    Was Johnson prime when he fought Hart?
    I don't think so.

    Was Jeffries so much stronger than Johnson?
    You base this on what?
    Faster than Johnson?
    I think not.

    Terrific stamina?
    Jeffries went 25rds ONCE, against a man 5' 9'' whom he out weighed by 32 lbs.Close fight
    Jeffries went 23rds ONCE, against a man 30lbs lighter, who was 8 years older, and he was losing it when the stoppage came.
    Jeffries went 20rds 3 times, in one he had a near 28lbs advantage,plus 5 inches in height.Close fight
    In another he was 63lbs the heavier man.Draw.
    In the other, facing a man near his own size .Draw.

    If Jeffries had terrific stamina, how good was the stamina of the men he massively outweighed, most of whom were considerably older too, who went those distances with him?



    Johnson went 20rds THIRTEEN TIMES.

    Johnson went 20rds with Frank Moran, when he was 36 years old.

    Johnson went 26rds with giant Willard when he was 37 ,and was in front at the time of the stoppage.

    A better performance than Jeffries own at 35, when he came back for Johnson.

    Johnson beat Pat Lester 225lbs 6' 3 1/2'' 21-5-3,when he was 48 years old, the fight went 15 rds to a decision for Jack.
    Lester was by no means great ,but two years previously he had beaten Floyd Johnson, and one year previously Bob Roper.
    Not bad for a man who was getting on for half a century ,and had lived the life Johnson had.


    You base Jeffries chances against Johnson on Johnson's fight with Hart ?
    How about basing them on the 20rd ko he gave Sam Mcvey, a man whom Jeffries was offered a large sum to fight, prior to this but declined?
     
  13. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,122
    Jun 2, 2006
    Corbett was one month off 37 years old ,and had not fought in 3 years, Jeffries would be hard pushed, not to improve on his previous performance .

    Ruhlin was hardly indestructible either ,he had been kod in 1 rd by Sharkey ,and kod in 6 by Fitz the year before Jeffries stopped him . Jeffries did not ko him, Ruhlin's corner stopped the fight between the 5th and 6th rds.
     
  14. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,589
    27,253
    Feb 15, 2006
     
  15. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,440
    9,427
    Jul 15, 2008
    I understand but too bad there are no punch stats for those fights because Jack fought at a Hopkins like pace ..he was in his mid 20's when he fought Hart and I believe he was in his prime. He sure was begging for a title shot ...I just see him having fits and fighting a survival fight against a prime Jim.