What if... Johnson defeats Dawson? good or bad for boxing?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by H ., Sep 9, 2009.


  1. G.A.V.

    G.A.V. Guest

    ha...hahaha... haha.

    That's funny. You're funny.
     
  2. BlueApollo

    BlueApollo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,827
    3
    May 19, 2007
    I don't care how big a Dawson fan you might be, anyone who wouldn't be just a little bit happy to see Glen win this thing is just a suck ass boxing fan. The man has paid his dues.
     
  3. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,768
    83,578
    Nov 30, 2006
    :good
     
  4. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,221
    5,875
    Apr 30, 2006
    That he has. I give him alot of credit for going from a padded-record prospect going into the Hopkins fight to developing into a legit world class fighter the hard way, fighting everyone on their own turf, in the following years. It's rare to see one fighter encompass both routes to prominence in a single career since they contradict one another, but Glen's done it. I'm happy to see any success he has.

    That said, he had everything go right for him the first time around and I couldn't score it any closer than 7-5 Dawson. If he overcomes even bigger odds and wins the rematch, fair to say even shitty fans will have no choice but to respect him.
     
  5. Xerant

    Xerant Gotta Hate negociations! Full Member

    4,822
    4
    May 11, 2009
    This thread shows how much Dawson is underrated
     
  6. BlueApollo

    BlueApollo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,827
    3
    May 19, 2007
    Great points.

    For the record, I think Dawson has come into his own and should dominate.
     
  7. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,070
    35,192
    Jun 23, 2005
    Bad for boxing. Dawson is a young star and boxing needs all the good young talent it can get.
     
  8. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,221
    5,875
    Apr 30, 2006
    Thanks.:thumbsup

    I see pretty much the same thing; I don't see Glen getting stopped, but I do think the scores will be a little wider this time around, probably around 9-3 Dawson. What this fight will be is a great measuring stick of how far Chad's come as a fighter; I'm expecting roughly the same performance from Glen (slightly worse due to the age factor) since the gameplan he had from the first fight gave him the best chance for success, so any improvements Chad's made in the mean time should be pretty clear.
     
  9. BigBone

    BigBone Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,466
    1,730
    Nov 20, 2007
    :deal
     
  10. H .

    H . Boxing Junkie banned

    12,826
    3
    Jan 20, 2007
    not sure about that... i mean, he had lots of trouble with johnson in that first fight. if dawson's that good, then johnson is that good too.

    part of me wants the young gun to prevail, but i wouldn't mind johnson getting what he deserves
     
  11. manhattanboxer3

    manhattanboxer3 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,358
    0
    May 26, 2009
    i respect glen johnson greatly but the dues he has paid have nothing to do with the fact that he lost to chad dawson the first time and will lose again.
     
  12. djm

    djm Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,208
    2
    Dec 17, 2006
    A Dawson win would be a notch better because of the (potential) "young star" factor. But a Johnson win is in no way "bad" for boxing...
    a) likely be a rematch, which would draw pretty good interest
    b) Johnson has a ton of respect from pretty much everyone
    c) it's not like Dawson has a big next fight anyway (Hopkins doesn't seem interested, who knows what Cloud's intention is)

    I don't think Calzaghe factors in at all. People sure like to throw his name into any thread they can.
     
  13. yogster740

    yogster740 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,725
    0
    May 9, 2006

    I believe those are some huts burning.

    Glen is definitely a guy who's very difficult not to like.
    On the other hand Chad is our local guy here.
    May the best man win.
     
  14. H .

    H . Boxing Junkie banned

    12,826
    3
    Jan 20, 2007
    It should be interesting
     
  15. Slider75

    Slider75 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,113
    3
    Oct 19, 2008
    Bad for boxing? Boxing is about either win or lose, the best man deserves to win.. cant see how that can be bad! It would definately be a disaster for Dawson fans! but as a huge fan of Glen Johnson i would really like the road warrior to get Dawsons scalp this time, the first fight was extremely close and Johnson should have got atleast a draw in that one!