What if Manny Pacquiao vs. Wilfredo "Bazooka" Gomez

bro, take it easy. not all are.

but johnco definitely is. with that, he already said that he is a nuthugger. how low can he go?? he called himself the worst possible name you could call a boxing fan.

they talk that way because they immitate the boxing news writers in the philippines, seriously, read any article by a filipino boxing writer and it will sound more of a pres release than a news artice. they were the ones that came up with **** like EM broke a couple of ribs and vomitted blood after the second match with pac or something like that.


anyway, he labelled duran as a quitter because the poor guy only knows duran as "that fighter who said no mas against one fighter at one point in time." trying to argue with them is like a dog running after its tail. you'll go round and round

 

it's all good man. i blew up too at the pacquiao thread earlier. i guess the nuthuggers affect us the same way.

anyway, with regards to the real topic of this thread, i think, like sane most people here, that gomez beats pac at 122 via late round tko. but pac improved a lot when he stepped up at 126 moreso at 130 so so pac beats him there. another thing is bazooka fought at 126 after he peaked so he'll have a hard time against pac

bazooka peaked at 122
pac peaking at 126-130
i guess you'll agree with that

 

that's fair enough:good

 

dont get me wrong bro... duran is great but i am not going to lick his balls for someone who is a quitter.......

let me put this way... if you are a hiring manager and you have this applicant.. resume harvard grad, straight A's, but when you called his employers they said he is a quitter and reasoning for this is he couldnt stand the pressure.. will you hire that guy??? :----( yes, impressive resume but a quitter doesnt warrant licking of balls... :good

as i have said this site is not xinghua agency and i am entitled to my opinion. duran or evey great right there have always the greater chance. but please pac is pound per pound numero dos for christs sake... pac is no cabby driver that duran fought please!!!!

you got your opinion i have mine.. pac is not yet there and i am not saying hes at par with duran. but i like his chances at 130 below against the great. not more than that. you can make an argument that pac is nothing above 130 because he aint prove anything yet, but below he got his chance. this is no nuthugging bro but all i am saying is if someone made duran quit, i dont see any reason that a POUND PER POUND NUMERO DOS is capable of doing the same feat.... got it...
:bbb:bbb

 

and pac bravely fought after he was hit with a body punch by medgoen? quitting is a part of boxing. sometimes you just say, "to hell with it" to fight another day. instead of putting it all on the line and getting killed. that's why there are tko's is for fighters who can't defend themselves anymore but are not smart enough to quit.

look at EM, it is clear that he could have gotten up after the third KD against pac. but he didn't. if he did, he would have gotten beaten up badly to the point that his health would have been in serious danger. but he did say no more and now he gets a crack at the 135 championship.

it's true that fighters who leave it all in the ring are to be respected. but sometimes you just have to swallow you pride and admit that you're having a bad day.

oh and the cabby driver idea is so original.

 

so tell me, are you a domestic helper? laborer?...stop crying! its you who's making a fool of the pinoys here by generalizing..if you're taking all these personally then specify those few pinoys here that you're babbling about, if being a laborer or helper is all you know of what pinoys are capable of then its time people here start ignoring you too:hi:

 

I just watch Gomez vs Laporte, it's part of my collection. Just watching Laporte give Gomez a hard time for 15 rounds makes me think that Gomez really have no chance to beat Pacquiao. Laporte is good but He lost in all his Big fights all through his career & Gomez can't put him Away?

Gomez style remind me of Cotto. They almost have the same speed & Style. But the Problem is Pac speed at 122 is almost twice the speed of gomez. Don't tell me Gomez has the best defense to survive Pac? Gomez no match for Pac!!! I suggest you watch this fight first before u bash me.

 

Marquez didn't win, He just got lucky Pac Broke his hand & the stupid judge Didn't know how to score. Don't you know what happened in Pac-EM's trilogy? Morales won the first but Pac got the cut & Morales cheat by not allowing pac to wear Cleto reyes. By the way both Morales & Marquez will end up in the HOF & top p4p mainstay. Laporte is not even close to be in that league.

 

You think that just because somebody won't make it to the WOF then, he doesnt' have a shot to defeat somebody else?atsch

The problem you have is that you think that because PAC can defeat MAB or EM then he can defeat anybody else. Do you know that MAB and EM probably won't even make it to the top 40/50? Do you want to make a resume for Pac based on two boxers? Do you think that a resume it is built based on two boxers?

Pac won't beat Gomez at 122, but you can not accept that. The question is who can beat Pac?

Somebody else asked you this question before. I insist, tell me who do you think can beat Pac, any fighter past or present, at 122. 126 or 130 and please don't give me the stupid answer you came with at that time.

Please tell me how you think Pac could beat Gomez, Sanchez, Arguello. This is just to start. Explain to me the way you think he can defeat those three guys I just mentioned. Tell me how? :think Can he win a decission? Please explain? :think

 

You know what? you should change your name to Thinhead instead. You want me to accept that pac won't beat Gomez??? I'm not like you I have my own opinion & I backed up with analysis.

Here's for you, Can you name a fighter better than MAB, EM & JMM, from 1995-Present on 122-130 weight-class during their time at that weightclass?????

Then name me who's a better fighter than Gomez at 122-130 during his era???

 

dont hold your breath.

what this kid doesnt understand is pac lost to a past his prime morales and then beat him in two of morales' last fights. morales was still good, but it wasnt the same morales who fought barrera the first time when he was at his best. not only that, morales isnt in anyones top 10 130 pound fighters. sanchez kos azuma nelson at 126, who is a great feather and atg super feather. see, no comparsion.

 

damn, this thread went crazy........

 

Just ****ing tell me how Pac could defeat those boxers. Period. Don't change the subject. We can talk about that latter. Explain to me how Pac would defeat those boxers. It is Pac against those boxers, one on one in the ring, now you tell me what kind of fight he would have to fight in order to defeat those boxers.

 

Not kidding. I believe that Nelson would kick hi ass.

 

Is nelson an ATg & P4p fighter when he fought Sanchez??? Nelson is just a Replacement & only 15-0 at that time. Look who'e stupid now!!!

Morales not the same as on the Pac 1st fight & 10 months later on the 2nd fight???
.
MAB that fought Pac not the same as the Hamed fight. So who's MAB will be on Pac next fight???

You guys have so many excuses. It's not a coincidence that Pac KOed both & Almost finished JMM in 1 rd & take Larios as tune up.