What if... MIKE TYSON VS. VITALI KLITSCHKO amazing video

I have no idea why Sanders didn't finish him when he had him out of the ring and almost out in whatever round that was.
Point being, One has to be somewhat tall and with reach to land on him, as perceived by his past fights. Tyson? :-(

 

it's not really a big deal to beat mike tyson.... Danny Williams, Kevin McBride, Buster Douglas.....

Vitali may not punch as hard as Tyson, but he is about 10x smarter than him

 

:good

 

u r a klit dick sucker. Iron mike would KTFO either klit in 2 tounds

 

This vid is a failure as an analysis since the Tyson in FNR 4 is the prime version from late 80s. That Tyson would win by UD. 2004 version of Tyson quits by round 9.

 

Do the Marciano v Ali comp fight.

 

If a 6 foot 3 inch, average powered Holyfield can beat prime Tyson, twice.........its not inconceivable that a 6 foot 8 inch, much more powerful, highly intelligent fighter like Vitali would also be able to keep Tyson at bay, and pick him apart. eventaully putting him down, as Lewis, and Holy both did.........:good

 

Agreed :good

 

quote=Jorodz;6754598]in 2004 maybe....and yeah, sanders rocked him and he went down. i really like vit (though i'm a huge wlad fan) but his hand touched[/quote]

 

Vitali has no business being in with a mike tyson.

 

You really think Tyson was prime in 1996 vs Holy? . . . Really! I think if they met in 04 it would be VK all he way but it it was the 1988 version of Tyson it would be a different story. tyson was to quick of foot, hands to fast and to good at cutting off the ring. I never really liked mike, in fact i hated him, but he would have got inside that that jab and VK uppercut is to telegraphed to land on him. I do not see him KOing VK but he would put a world of hurt on him and win by UD. In the simulation tyson and VK handspeed was the same and quickness was the same . . . that was not the case at all . . . not even close.

if you where to simulate any more heavies do Louis v Ali . . . the only match-up that counts

 

Lean back defense, on top of being 6'8, and underrated foot and handspeed himself? Add on top of that a good chin and counterpunching ability.
Long night for Tyson.

 

:rofl One problem with that logic, 96 Evander Holyfield was better than any version of Vitali.

 

yes leaning back leaves the body open . . . i do not think it would be a fun night for either guy I just think 88 tyson was better. I agree with his hand his hand and foot speed is slightly underrated but not even close to tyson. It would have been one hell of a fight . . . to bad it would never happen!