so pac should have fought margo right after the pac-jmm2? or pac should have fought mosley after demolishing ddiaz?
the thing is, if floyd had clottey, margo and add cotto to his resume, those same set of people that criticize pac would be praising floyd as the GOAT for cleaning out the welter.
it was actually floyd's job to fight them welters since he's been at the weight for several years already but it was the small man pacquiao who did his dirty job along with those welters fighting each other. floyd was contented to come back and fight a lightweight.
no, he should fight people when they are still relevant, not after looking like total ****, and in most cases, like total **** more than once, and often consecutively furthermore, following your example...he fought ODLH @ WW right after diaz....why was ODLH @ WW ok, but margo @ WW at that time not ok?
Who called out the fight? It's DLH, and what happened? DLH got his ass kicked by a lightweight. I need no excuses for that, because it's DLH fault to go down in weight ...And Margo in the first place has no business fighting 135 lbers. After Pac beat DLH, he then continued fighting big welters. give us an example on who pac should have fought and when?
i dont care who called out who so now margo has no place fighting pac then, by ODLH does? fact is, pac post 130 has fought guys who have taken beatings, and/or shown MAJOR decline before pac fought them
well it's better to fight better fighters and who generates more $. so you are comparing cotto with berto??? if you pit these two against each other, who wins? berto? hell no!