What if Pacquiao stayed as a lightweight and cleaned out the division?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by unsigned_userv2, Nov 15, 2010.


  1. paulcris

    paulcris Member Full Member

    428
    0
    Jul 27, 2008
    cleaning out the jr WW division would be better.
     
  2. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    legacy and money-wise, there is no other path pac could have taken where he would much better than now. anyone who thinks of other path that would give pac better legacy and money must be out of their damn mind.
     
  3. stevebhoy87

    stevebhoy87 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,304
    5
    Dec 7, 2007
    Actually path he followed added far more to his legacy, i could have seen him clearly out lightweight after the diaz fight. Did i see him doing what he has actually done after that fight, no chance.

    Now if he went back down to light welter and cleared that out today that would add a lot to his legacy, not as much as beating mayweather would though but if that fight doesn't happen its a good route for manny.
     
  4. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,133
    10,552
    Jul 28, 2009
    Do you think Max Baer was more skilled and intelligent than Max Schmeling? I think the opposite. He *****-slapped Schmeling all around the ring though and I would say for no more than being bigger and stronger and more durable. Do you think Foreman was more intelligent or skilled than Joe Frazier? I don't. But Foreman beat the **** out of Frazier just the same, and I'd say only because he was bigger, stronger and more durable. Just like size can only compensate for so much against greater skill, skill has it's limitations too when compensating for size and power.
     
  5. cilldara11

    cilldara11 Guest

    Nail- head- hit.

    Imagine if he beat Martinez and Williams next. Unbelievable.
     
  6. winterchill

    winterchill Power Combo! Full Member

    802
    0
    Aug 10, 2010
    the alternate route sucks! i like the route hes taking now!
     
  7. boxbox

    boxbox Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,220
    0
    Feb 4, 2006
    He forever solidified his status in boxing with what he did.
     
  8. KO KIDD

    KO KIDD Loyal Member Full Member

    30,273
    5,897
    Oct 5, 2009
    Valero and Katsidis probably wouldnt do that much legacy wise and I think Casa and JMM were too big of risks

    at the higher weights he is so fast he can get away with his flaws

    JMM and Casa at 135 would be fast enough to counter him

    Juan Diaz would have been a great fight
     
  9. BoppaZoo

    BoppaZoo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,407
    4
    Jan 21, 2007
    Im going to be honest when i say this if he Pacquiao stayed at 135 and cleaned out the division.

    Someone would have got seriously hurt. Thats my feeling.

    I mean can you see Humberto Soto or Casamayor taking the beating Margarito just took and he is huge and has got massive heart with a great chin.

    Could you see Soto lasting or even not ending up seriously hurt e.g Coma or even worse.

    I feel half the reason they moved him up after David Diaz was because he could really really hurt someone.
     
  10. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    casamayor was already shot by the time pac moved-up to lightweight.
     
  11. Cobbler

    Cobbler Shoemaker To The Stars Full Member

    19,216
    2
    Dec 10, 2005
    This is nuts. Lets start here: Katsidis does not have 'some similarities' to Hatton, one was a two weight world champion and linear champion at his best weight who had only lost to the best fighter in the world, the other has lost twice, is yet to win an actual full world title and nearly got knocked out by Graham ****ing Earl.

    So we've got Marquez, who Pac already beat, and Valero, who went nuts before he could really face anyone good, so it's unknown where he could have reached. The other three are laughable. They've all lost to people who Pacquaio beat, or to people who lost to people that Pacquiao beat.

    Diaz lost to Malignaggi, who lost to Hatton and Cotto, and to Marquez.
    Casamayor lost to Castillo who lost to Hatton, and to Marquez
    And Katsidis lost to Casmayor and Diaz (see above).
     
  12. unsigned_userv2

    unsigned_userv2 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,138
    0
    Sep 3, 2010
    Somehow I don't think that would factor into the equation. It's boxing, and boxing entails risks to the fighters health. They didn't ban George Foreman or Julian Jackson just because they had ferocious punches.

    I'm still convinced Pac is a natural lightweight, so why would his handlers care about the lightweight opponents health, yet move their own fighter into weight divisions above his natural to fight physically stronger opponents?

    David was beat up pretty bad, because frankly, he is barely a B class fighter with little defense.
     
  13. unsigned_userv2

    unsigned_userv2 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,138
    0
    Sep 3, 2010
    I was talking about style with Hatton-Katsidis (i.e. face first pressure/brawlers), not achievements. I assumed that was common sense. Hatton almost got dropped by the mediocre Lazcano, doesn't mean anything. Katsidis beat Amonsot, Chavez, and Escobedo, not to mention KO Mitchell on his own home turf. So he more than meets the criteria for a top contender.

    I think Valero's one-sided destruction of Antonio Demarco would suggest otherwise. Sure he wasn't able to reach his potential, but at the time he was highly rated (Ring magazine had him as their no.1 lightweight contender at one stage), and some critics argued Pacquiao and Valero should fight.

    JMM v Pacquiao II is still one of the most controversial and close decisions of recent, and most boxing fans would like (if not are demanding) to see a rubber match to truley see who the real victor is.

    Diaz was moving up in weight against Malignaggi who even though he lost, certainly did well against Cotto. Casamayor is a decorated fighter and up there with the best until the last few fights. The Castillo of '07 was not the same Castillo in '04.

    And what's your point that the good fighters have faced one another - lost a few, won a few? Ali, Foreman, Norton, and Frazier all did the tango with one another, lost some/won some yet still are great fighters?
     
  14. EJDiaZ

    EJDiaZ Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,213
    420
    Aug 21, 2010
  15. Cobbler

    Cobbler Shoemaker To The Stars Full Member

    19,216
    2
    Dec 10, 2005
    No, my point was that facing those good fighters is better then facing people who lost to them.

    Seriously? Mitchell? Escobedo? You think this compares with Cotto's resume?

    No, he didn't do well, he got absolutely battered. He 'did well' to make it to the end of the fight. Then he got hammered by Hatton. Then he handled Diaz comfortably twice. As above, with Katsidis, these are completely different levels we're talking about. You can't just say 'Hatton and Katsidis are both come forward pressure fighters, so beating one is comparable to beating the other, they're levels apart, as both their careers show.