What if Prescott KTFOs Khan again?!

Boxing on a main event bill in America (which included Gamboa) and getting bitten by his opponent.

 

Parley view francez?

 

yea but it still don't matter, i thought Prescott had the WBO intercontinental belt, he beat khan when khan was no1.. so how the **** did Barrera leap frog him!!!!!

don't make sense, prescott should be fighting for the WBO title before khan

 

If your plan is to not get KO'd then you have to implement it for the whole 12 rounds or you lose, plain and simple.

If Khan dominated an opponent for 11 rounds and still lost, I think that would probably damage him psychologically more than what happenned first time round with Prescott. Michael Nunn was never the same ater getting KO'd by James Toney late on when he was miles ahead on points.

I think he would get more bul**** if that happenned, and most of it would be justified.

 

Prescott a class above!!

the guy got lucky caught amir cold, then amirs inexperience showed when he got up too quick rather than stayin down on 1 knee till 8,

khan would win a rematch ! obv just my opinion!!

 

In the history of boxing I've never heard of any boxers plan being 'Not to get KO'd'.

 

id guess its most boxers main objective when stepping into the ringatsch

 

It may finally, finally shatter some of the hype around Khan and get his team to start planning a more realistic career path. It would be fascinating to see if Amir really has learned anything and can turn the tables this time.

 

It will be harder for him now you've blabbed the masterplan to the whole world...

 

'Main objective.'
You made me spit out my coffee:twisted:

 

Are you suggesting most of them plan to get KO'd.

Let me know if you hear of a boxer with that plan so I can put a bet on their opponent.

 

Khan was still getting caught against Barrera (although only two meaningful shots), and this was with the new 'super defence', so it would be no different, Khan would get caught again like I said in a previous post, but I believe he would last longer (if he didn't then he should just retire immediately).

 

You will be trained to avoid punches. You'll never be trained to avoid getting KO'd wise ass, that's the result of the punches.

You guys seriously don't see how ****ing dumb that statement is???

 

So you plan to avoid punches so you won't get KO'd but your not planning to avoid getting KO'd.

Do you want to buy a timeshare in Aberdeen, it's 35 degrees centigrade up there all year round?

You're obviously thick enough to beleive that.

 

Trainer: 'Now remember all your training and our master gameplan - DO NOT GET KNOCKED OUT!! Sure we worked on you're punches and your movement, speed etc but the main thing we did in training was 'How not to get knocked out!! All that Anti-knock out training we've done should come through now!!'

Now do you realise how thick you are being?
You've obviously never stepped foot in a ring.

You train to avoid punches for 20 reasons. Being knocked out is just one of those reasons. To call it 'The main objective' is ridiculous.

No-one has ever taken up boxing to learn how not to get knocked out. No top proffesional has ever stepped into the ring with the masterplan 'The most important thing here is to not get knocked out' that is a ridiculous statement and very simplistic.