What if: Whitaker vs. Cotto?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by g0tpHo, Sep 3, 2007.


  1. Relentless

    Relentless VIP Member banned

    65,864
    16
    Mar 5, 2006
    i dont think briggs knew how to spell liakhovich but he still knocked him through the rope.
     
  2. dave82

    dave82 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,570
    0
    Mar 5, 2006
    whitaker by wide decision 118 - 109. Point deduction against whitaker for hitting cotto whilst having him in a headlock. Ala Nelson style. :)
     
  3. PR Boxing Lore

    PR Boxing Lore Member Full Member

    358
    0
    Aug 11, 2007
    :good
     
  4. sues2nd

    sues2nd Fading into Bolivian... Full Member

    9,760
    8
    Aug 7, 2004
    :good
     
  5. dave82

    dave82 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,570
    0
    Mar 5, 2006
    Not even the powerful trinidad was able to stop the past prime whitaker. :good
     
  6. Relentless

    Relentless VIP Member banned

    65,864
    16
    Mar 5, 2006
    no cotto cant knock whitaker through the ropes, i was just making an example for the guy who said that cotto cant spell whitaker thats why he cant beat him.
     
  7. joito3

    joito3 Active Member Full Member

    1,497
    1
    Mar 5, 2006
    whitaker isn't prime at 147 cotto would be too much for him at 147
     
  8. dave82

    dave82 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,570
    0
    Mar 5, 2006
    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA :rofl :rofl
     
  9. joito3

    joito3 Active Member Full Member

    1,497
    1
    Mar 5, 2006
    147 wasn't pea's prime weight you can laugh all you want
     
  10. joito3

    joito3 Active Member Full Member

    1,497
    1
    Mar 5, 2006
    Cotto at 147 is a better fighter than Chavez was at 147 and Vasquez isn't in the same league as cotto ..... Chavez was much smaller than Cotto just because Pea was able to beat Chavez doesn't equate to Pea being able to deal with Cotto who is much stronger ... Chavez started his career at 126 or 130 lbs Cotto was a huge 140 to start his career
     
  11. dave82

    dave82 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,570
    0
    Mar 5, 2006
    Better than Chavez? Based on what? Defeating Judah? He may have been stronger but he was not the better fighter.

    Vazquez was 53-1 coming into that fight IMO had an impressive resume, defeating the likes of Wright, Castillejo etc.
     
  12. brooklyn1550

    brooklyn1550 Roberto Duran Full Member

    24,017
    47
    Mar 4, 2006
    Chavez was better at 147 than Cotto until proven otherwise...I have no doubt in my mind Chavez would have stopped Carlos Quintana, Oktay Urkal, and Zab Judah.

    One day though, I definitely believe Cotto will be looked at as the better fighter at 147.
     
  13. Alo2006

    Alo2006 R.I.P Sean Taylor Full Member

    10,021
    1,414
    Jun 28, 2006
    Whitaker by UD
     
  14. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,217
    169
    Jul 23, 2004
    Cotto's much more versatile than Chavez. He stands off better at long range, and he's got a much better jab. Cotto may well not be as proven as Chavez, but he's a much more complete fighter when balancing everything out in all areas. Chavez always came forward patiently breaking down his opponent, Cotto's very effective at that as well. But Cotto's so much better behind the jab and showing a wider variety of punches.

    The bottom line is, Cotto has a bit more to his game than being a brilliant pressure fighter.

    Whitaker still handles him fairly easily, 116-112.
     
  15. Caper

    Caper How about a fair shake? banned Full Member

    10,908
    1,362
    Apr 4, 2005
    I say Swea by UD in a competitive fight.....

    The biased on these boards are incredible, Cotto is excellent against slick movers he understands their mentality and times them extremely well. Pea was a special fighter so he would rarely be trapped by Cotto but Cotto will have his moments.