What is a more convincing win

sues2nd · Apr 1, 2008

thewoo said:

Say both fighter A and fighter B have a common opponent in fighter C. fighter C is a huge puncher.

Fighter A outboxes him thoughly over 12 rounds but never significantly hurts him although he wins by a large margin lets even say a complete shut out on all cards

Fighter B slugs with fighter C takes a lot of shots but is never visibly significantly hurt. He puts a serious ass whooping down and stops fighter C in about 5 rounds.

Which win would you consider more convincing? I'd go with fighter B. Although fighter C was more competitive against him than against fighter A he left absolutly no doubt as to who would win a rematch. He showed that he can take everything fighter C has to offer and still beat the **** out of him.

Fighter A on the other hand while still a great win leaves the question, what would happen if fighter C was able to land the big bomb
Click to expand...

Id go with A. Some fighters arent blessed with a big punch. Look at Pernell Whitaker.... The sheer fact that he could shut people out over 12 and completely embarass them is much more impressive than a big puncher who happens to catch them in a competative fight.

Log in or Sign up

What is a more convincing win

sues2nd Fading into Bolivian... Full Member

Log in or Sign up

Forums

What is a more convincing win

sues2nd Fading into Bolivian... Full Member