If you can barely lay a glove on your opponent over 12 rounds and lose a lopsided decision as the champion in your backyard, you got schooled. Wlad was the master of stinking the joint out and winning wide in the process. Fury beat him without the 12 round hugfest too lol.
Of course it is Foreman competed in 2 different eras 70s/90s, and as an old man won a Lineal title in 90s. Ali beat Foreman at his best in the 70s. You said Ali didn't have a win after 1978 and theres no evidence he would compete in different eras. Well considering Foreman did and Ali beat Foreman at his best. I would expect a prime Ali to be able to compete very well in the modern eras. Considering smaller fighters like Byrd, Holyfield, did. And even Usyk now who's similar size to Ali.
Being an ATG has nothing to do with H2H ability compared to fighters 50, 100 or 200 years in the future. It's triangulation based on one fight and Ali's not Foreman, whose attributes aged remarkably well. Young also beat Foreman "at his best in the 70's", assuming that Foreman was at his best in the 70's. In several respects he was better in the 90's. I said that Ali might well lose to most top champions who came after him as they had huge advantages. Byrd and Usyk are southpaws and Ali wasn't Holyfield, perhaps Holyfield was better than Ali. And even he lost the majority of the fights with Bowe and Lewis.
Ali was beating fighters of 6'3 220 pounds you're making him sound ancient, he was a reasonably sized Heavyweight and wouldn't be out of place in most eras. As for H2H ability i think that's part of being ATG aswell as achievements, and Ali by most fans is rated pretty highly H2H. Foreman was 45 years old when he won the Heavyweight title, you can't tell me he wouldn't of done better at his peak. What it shows is that someone from Ali's era competed well in other eras. If you want another example Larry Holmes was in his 40s and came close to beating a prime Holyfield and schooled Ray Mercer. Again Holmes was of similar height, reach, size, of Muhammad Ali. I see no reason why a prime Muhammad Ali with his attributes in speed, talent, heart, durability, couldn't compete in modern era. Well that's an assumption based on no evidence which champions are those ? i'm not saying he beats them all but to assume he loses to "most of them" is a bit presumptuous. So what if they're Southpaws ? they still get by on their talent do they not ? neither are big punchers and have to rely on their talent and skills so why can't Ali do the same i'm confused ? And perhaps Ali is better than Holyfield ? i can easily say that.
Here's a list of every Heavyweight champion after Muhammad Ali. Larry Holmes = could go either way but i slightly favour Ali. Mike Weaver = Ali would win John Tate = Ali would win Michael Dokes = Ali would win Gerrie Coetzee = Ali would win Greg Page = Ali would win Tim Witherspoon = Ali would win Pinklon Thomas = Ali would win Greg Page = Ali would win Tony Tubbs = Ali would win Michael Spinks = Ali would win Trevor Berbick = Ali would win Mike Tyson = could go either way i can see an argument for both fighters. Bonecrusher Smith = Ali would win Francesco Damani = Ali would win Buster Douglas = Ali would beat the version of Douglas who fought Holyfield Evander Holyfield = Tough fight that i see Ali edging Riddick Bowe = Bowe struggled vs fighters who fought him on the outside aka Tony Tubbs, i think Ali could win a decision but tough fight. Ray Mercer = Ali would win Michael Moorer = Ali would win Lennox Lewis = Pre Steward loses but i think a prime Lewis would beat Ali. Herbie Hide = Ali would win Tommy Morrison = Ali would win Oliver McCall = Ali would win Bruce Seldon = Ali would win Frank Bruno = Ali would win Old Foreman = Ali would win Henry Akinwande = Ali would win Shannon Briggs = Ali would win Vitali Klitschko = Ali could lose this very tough match up for him. Chris Byrd = Ali would win John Ruiz = Ali would win Hasim Rahman = Ali would win Roy Jones Jr = Ali would win Lamon Brewster = Ali would win Nikolai Valuev = Ali would win Siarhei Liakhovic = Ali would win Wladimir Klitschko = Again another losable match up for Ali very tough fight. Ruslan Chagaev = Ali would win Sultan Ibragimov = Ali would win Samuel Peter = Ali would win David Haye = Ali would win Alexander Povetkin = Ali would win Deontay Wilder = Ali would win Charles Martin = Ali would win Andy Ruiz Jr = Ali would win Anthony Joshua = Ali would win Tyson Fury = Haven't seen enough of Fury vs smaller skillful fighters, but this would be a very tough match up for Ali could lose this. Manuel Charr = Ali would win Joseph Parker = Ali would win Oleksandr Usyk = Another very tough match up but i haven't seen enough of Usyk at Heavyweight to make a real opinion. So i fail to see how Ali would lose to "most of these champions"
Ali was a Legend......Muhammad Ali was one of the greatest boxers in history, the first fighter to win the world heavyweight championship on three separate occasions.....This is incredible performance Won the third Heavyweight title at 33 way past his best really and defeated the Monster and Prime Geoerge Foreman to take a record 3rd Heavyweight title.....This is Greatness will probably never be done again.!!!
I sometimes have similar beliefs, but then I remember a fat foreman with a 10 year layoff compete and never get knocked out by modern HWs.
1. Achievement/resume 2. H2H ability 3. Buzz/star power 4. Longevity Number 3 is a personal one of mine. Mike Tyson for example scores high on that criteria.
Your logic only applies to heavy weights. And you are right. Not many giant south paws with skills like Zhang in the heavies. All the other weights have limits, so were not going to see middleweights weighing 40 pounds more and 6-8 inches taller today than 50 years ago.
This reminds me of 9 months ago when people were telling me Joyce was an ATG because a fighter like him had never been seen before. Rating people like Joyce and Zhang before they've proven themselves is a waste of words. Would Zhang be formidable to most ATGs? I think so. Trying to draw the line as to who he could beat or who he couldn't, when he hasn't fought a single tier 1 fighter, is pointless, imo. That being said, let's hope he gets the fights in this era to really help determine just how good he really is... which would lend more credibility to these fantasy fight claims.
People fear a strong Communist brother, especially a 6'6'' 287lbs one who can punch holes in castle walls, like they fear a strong Soviet brother and a strong Brit brother. They fear change to the old world order. It is what it is. Chinese power is real and I am very feel Chat poop, get Zhang'd
Foreman and Holmes were different people to Ali. Foreman was a big puncher, 250 lbs in the 90's, who came from behind to KO an ex-LHW southpaw, who may well have beaten Ali (though Moorer wasn't top 4 in the 90's). Holmes schooled and stopped Ali. Mike Tyson and whoever else from subsequent generations also may well have beaten Ali, who would have been at an informational, scientific and stylistic disadvantage against Tyson. "As for H2H ability i think that's part of being ATG aswell as achievements" It's absolutely not when talking about between generations without running into a self-defeating paradox. This is the key point: Whether Joe Louis or Marciano could beat a 6’6, 20 stone, skilled southpaw power punching contender from 70-85 years in the future or whether they’d get KO’d early is irrelevant in assessing their greatness. By your logic, they are increasingly less great over time if they couldn't beat Zhang or whoever comes along in the future. Obviously they never experienced anyone remotely like Zhang and they couldn't because those eras were far more limited in terms of global scale, science, size, stance etc. They could only be great within their context. Would Louis and Marciano be less great in your view if Zhang would KO men with their exact attributes early?