What is the excuse Pac and his fans can use for not fighting JMM???

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by saul_ir34, Mar 3, 2009.


  1. Soriano

    Soriano Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,949
    0
    Sep 8, 2008
    If that excuse is fighting for the draw and not beating him decisively during the first fight, I can agree with you. Excuses are actually proferred by losers. In this case, Pac did not lose, he in reality won if not for one dumb judge's error.
     
  2. harrison

    harrison feu-nrmf md 2005 Full Member

    3,198
    0
    Dec 4, 2008
    the victor doesnt call out the loser, specially if the loser kissed the canvass 4 times and held on that rope for dear life.... :D only people who are aching for rematch are those guys who got owned in here ..... :good


    and BTW...

    pac obliterates class b and senior citizen fighters, not like jmm having constipation with leftovers like juan diaz and senior citizen casa. :yep:yep

    In addition, class b fighters,oldies, tune ups are meant to be obliterated, not meant for constipation :good

    so go on, be a fool. as if jmm got an advantage in defeating a leftover going in 4-4 in the closing few rounds :hey

    you are just mad....

    pac made this to your boy....

    This content is protected



    :good
     
  3. theunderdog

    theunderdog Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,814
    1
    Jul 4, 2006

    the first one should have been a pac win. yes jmm won more rounds but didnt win enough to overhaul the four points he gave away in the first round. i scored the next 11 as 7-4 for jmm. so it was 113-112 for pac same as the score that the supid judge should have had.

    the two judges who scored it 115-110 for both fighters were both high. scaring error caused pac to lose that one and that sir is a fact.

    the second one was close and could have gone either way. there were at least two rounds that were relatively equal. it just so happened that it went pac's way. i scored it 114-113 jmm but there is no way that i'll be saying it was a clear win for jmm because it wasnt. it was so that a pac of jmm win could be branded as clear.
     
  4. theunderdog

    theunderdog Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,814
    1
    Jul 4, 2006
    this is exactly what i meant in my earlier post. things like this do not help our case. so yeah pac knocked down four times. you want the jmm fans to count how many rounds jmm compared to pac's?

    fact, casual fans prefer the flashy highlight reel kd's and ko's and do not understand nor appreciate the sweet science that jmm displays. please do not be like them.
     
  5. DROP

    DROP Member Full Member

    248
    0
    Jan 2, 2008
    im a 100% messkin. so dont get it twisted. there is no excuse. as mutch as i hate to say it jmm lost both times to pac . they were close fights tho. so why take a step back & fight someone you alredy beat & got a draw against. jmm should stay in the 135 class. but then again im shure pac will get stoped at 140 so eventually hell come back down to 135 & maybe land another fight with jmm.
     
  6. bernie4366

    bernie4366 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,681
    22
    Aug 29, 2006
    harrison
    This message is hidden because harrison is on your ignore list.
    ---------------

    You guys really should try this, it makes this board such a nicer place to hang out.
     
  7. harrison

    harrison feu-nrmf md 2005 Full Member

    3,198
    0
    Dec 4, 2008

    as i have said everyone is entitled to his opinion. i am not persuaded by anyone. i have my preference. i am a casual fan. i pay to watch exciting fight not sleepy fights....

    you can count any rounds you want, but do you think you can pin point all the rounds that belongs to jmm???? there were a lot of close rounds that goes either way, thats why the reason pac hanged in there becuase he was able to inflict heavier damage to jmm. The kd's are not imaginary to be counted. they are automatic and not controversial. counting close rounds are hard to give. as if pac only lived with his patented KD's. Jmm got outboxed too.
     
  8. harrison

    harrison feu-nrmf md 2005 Full Member

    3,198
    0
    Dec 4, 2008

    so bernie....

    who's more dangerous again??

    juan diaz or hatton??? :lol::lol:
     
  9. bernie4366

    bernie4366 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,681
    22
    Aug 29, 2006
    View Post Today, 06:07 PM
    Remove user from ignore listharrison
    This message is hidden because harrison is on your ignore list.

    View Post Today, 06:08 PM
    Remove user from ignore listharrison
    This message is hidden because harrison is on your ignore list.
    ------------------


    hahaha... he's just a troll. Put him on iggy. It's the only way to shut him up.
     
  10. Simple100

    Simple100 Active Member Full Member

    1,329
    0
    Apr 10, 2008
    I agree with thunder that you cannot please everyone. but you cannot blame PAC he is fighting champ after champ in case of D Diaz he is the only available fighter that time since Nate had a piece against Guzman and Caza against Katsidis. After that fight Oscar the biggest payday for a boxer! Who will not fight this guy $$$$$? After all almost no one gives PAC a chance against Oscar but he proves us wrong... you are insane for calling PAC running against a boxer which he already beat twice. Now PAC is fighting Hatton which is never been beaten at 140lbs and legacy wise, it will be a six division for PAC to conquer since he had 4 division/5 division (fly, S bantam, S feather and Lw) 2 lineal one at fly and feather when he beat Barrera who is the king at that time. If PAC choose to fight PBF, COTTO or MOSLEY for his last 2 fights will you blame him? for not taking JMM... I really love to see the III fight "to end this war" but PAC will not stay any longer he will retire but for me we are all "fans" winner because we saw a fighter from his humble beginning to Stardom and yet never thrash talk his opponent but even help them when they fall, share his blessings and generosity with other people.
     
  11. harrison

    harrison feu-nrmf md 2005 Full Member

    3,198
    0
    Dec 4, 2008

    getting reinforcement mr clean....

    This content is protected


    :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
     
  12. kadyo

    kadyo Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,771
    2
    May 12, 2007
    :roll:

    Either you're an idiot or a genius.
     
  13. Soriano

    Soriano Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,949
    0
    Sep 8, 2008
    Nah. We love to read his posts. I put you on my ignore list instead, troll. :hi:
     
  14. harrison

    harrison feu-nrmf md 2005 Full Member

    3,198
    0
    Dec 4, 2008
    if jmm is so smart how come he exchanged 700 K payday for 30 K peanuts?

    :D;)
     
  15. harrison

    harrison feu-nrmf md 2005 Full Member

    3,198
    0
    Dec 4, 2008


    :rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

    :good:good:good

    bernie is mr clean...

    This content is protected


    he wants to commercialized in esb :lol:

    just compare the pix to his avy :lol: