What is the general consensus on Jack Dempsey in 1926-27?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by dpw417, Oct 20, 2014.

  1. doug.ie

    doug.ie 'Classic Boxing Society' Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2008
    Messages:
    14,214
    Likes Received:
    80
    good. very little really good factual reading on darcy i'm finding. have read the ballad of les darcy.
    will it be the same type of style of book as the greb book was ?, i'll be buying it anyway....like i've said too many times, that greb book is one of the greatest things i own.
    .
     
  2. klompton2

    klompton2 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2013
    Messages:
    10,974
    Likes Received:
    5,433
     
  3. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2006
    Messages:
    71,599
    Likes Received:
    27,272
    Lets face it, Sharkey could have potentially lost to both of them in the same year.

    Part of that would have been, because his fights against dangerous opponents, were far more in number, and close together..
     
  4. klompton2

    klompton2 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2013
    Messages:
    10,974
    Likes Received:
    5,433
     
  5. klompton2

    klompton2 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2013
    Messages:
    10,974
    Likes Received:
    5,433
    Sharkey is a wildcard in any mythical matchup. When he was on he was really good and could seemingly do it all. When he wasnt he was mediocre.
     
  6. burt bienstock

    burt bienstock Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2010
    Messages:
    18,285
    Likes Received:
    400
    dpw, thanks, yes I who was weaned in the 1940s,has loved boxing lo these many decades and have been fortunate to have seen the greatest fighters and fights ringside...I am NOT a writer but an ardent fight fan of the past...
    As far as how would the Dempsey of 1919-23 have done against Gene Tunney were they to have met then ? Most everything I have read by
    fight people of those Dempsey prime days, the majority believed that Dempsey's speed of attack would have overcome any defense Tunney
    would put up, and Dempsey's quick savage offense would carry the day.
    I too believe that the contemporaries of Dempsey and Tunney come closer
    to the truth of their relative abilities, having seen them fight, than people 90 years later...Dempsey's main asset as a great fighter was his speed
    which combined with great two handed power and take no prisoner
    attitude, made him the idol of the masses. When Dempsey took three years off, and returned in 1926, tackling a top-notch boxer in Gene Tunney
    without fighting for 3 years, without ONE tuneup bout, without his mentor
    Jack Kearns, with whom Dempsey was suing in court, this rusty almost 32 year old edition without legs and reflexis was ready to be taken...So yes
    I go along with the vast majority of boxing people of that era who believe
    that the prime swifter Dempsey would have beaten Gene Tunney, and I am in good company...cheers...
     
  7. LittleRed

    LittleRed Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2012
    Messages:
    8,850
    Likes Received:
    239
    I didn't think about it; we haven't had a good Dempsey blow up in a while. Once I saw dancer's legs it brought me back to a better time.