What is the ideal physique for a boxer to have?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by TerryESB, Oct 1, 2012.


  1. banny

    banny Active Member Full Member

    1,418
    0
    Jan 22, 2010
  2. dealt_with

    dealt_with Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,931
    1,230
    Apr 27, 2012
    Ideal physique ffs... whatever works for the individual, boxers come in all shapes and sizes
     
  3. godlikerich

    godlikerich Active Member Full Member

    1,188
    1
    Aug 27, 2010
    There isn't really an 'ideal physique'. A lot of it depends on the style of the fighter. I think strong and conditioned legs and back muscles are always a benefit to any fighter though, regardless of style. But some guys benefit from being slighter and others benefit from being bigger and stronger. Look at Foreman's physique; it complemented his style perfectly - strong legs and calves, strong back, and huge arms which facilitated his slower, clubbing but tremendously powerful blows. He could throw arm punches and knock you out such was the strength of his arms. That worked for him. Having big arms would do nothing for someone like Pacquiao or Mayweather or even Ali.
     
  4. TerryESB

    TerryESB The Final Boss Full Member

    13,376
    434
    May 4, 2009
    I'd say it makes a huge difference.

    What do you think would be better in general? Being a 6'7 240 lbs HW with long arms. Or a 5'10 240 HW with short arms and oversized muscles.
     
  5. Borincano

    Borincano Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,261
    7
    Mar 1, 2008
    Erik Morales and Diego Corrales has these skinny builds, but they were excellent fighters.
     
  6. TerryESB

    TerryESB The Final Boss Full Member

    13,376
    434
    May 4, 2009
    Height and reach > big muscles

    245 lbs vs 245 lbs

    This content is protected
     
  7. GladiatoR

    GladiatoR Guest

    Insert Tyson vs Biggs picture here.
     
  8. TerryESB

    TerryESB The Final Boss Full Member

    13,376
    434
    May 4, 2009
    Mike Tyson is an exception. How many other under 6'0 heavyweights have been successful in the last 20 years?
     
  9. Ahurath

    Ahurath Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,270
    246
    Feb 25, 2012
    Of course usefull muscle mass is important like anyother sport. But the focus shouldn't be the mass but the usefull mass. I mean ofcourse boxers would benefit from lifting heavyweight and getting more explosive.


    So yes carrying around tons of fat like arreola and John doesn't help them one bit. I'm not saying that the one with the best looking body wins the fight but if a fat guy won over a more well trained guy it wasn't because his fat it was his skill.
     
  10. Ahurath

    Ahurath Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,270
    246
    Feb 25, 2012

    Well it isn't about the height never has been. Skill wins fights not genetics.
     
  11. Manning

    Manning Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,434
    1,011
    Mar 6, 2011
    Well built core muscles giving an incredible strong set of 6 pack muscles with a nice little beer belly over that as to absorb punches well.
     
  12. 6'4south

    6'4south Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,943
    81
    Apr 2, 2012
    Not to sound like I'm avoiding the question all together, but I don't know if there is an ideal physique as it relates to boxing. However I do think that over muscularity is definitely detrimental to a boxer, especially at heavier weights. I do think body types play a factor in boxing and sports in general, but I think it has more to do with genetics and how an athletes uses his physical attributes.
     
  13. 20a87

    20a87 Boxing Addict banned

    6,682
    0
    Aug 22, 2009
  14. 20a87

    20a87 Boxing Addict banned

    6,682
    0
    Aug 22, 2009
  15. Slothrop

    Slothrop Boxing Junkie banned

    11,540
    2
    Nov 25, 2004