What is the proper criteria for P4P Rankings?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by asero, Apr 28, 2009.


Page 3 of 3
  1. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member

    79,438
    2,647
    Feb 1, 2007
    well yea a p4p ranking is how good a fighter is today.

    An ATG ranking is very different. Its still about ability but there are some abilities that are applied over a long period of time. Longevity is the perfect example of that. How long can a fighter stay at the top of his game? Someone who was very good over a 20 year period will usually be ranked higher than someone who was better than him for just a year or two but alot worse during the rest of his career.
     
    PH|LLA, Apr 29, 2009
    PH|LLA, Apr 29, 2009
    #31
  2. asero

    asero Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,376
    309
    Jan 8, 2009

    agree...i think 60-40 is a fair division between resume and ability in ATG rankings because of longetivity factor...you have to match-up them a hypothetical set-up with fellow ATGs so that they would be timeless and to assess their real ability and talent.
     
    asero, Apr 29, 2009
    asero, Apr 29, 2009
    #32
Page 3 of 3