what is the worst title dfense in recent years

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by madmanc3210, Jan 3, 2012.


  1. Steenalized

    Steenalized Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,337
    1
    Sep 20, 2010
    Don King's doing. Wlad fixed that nice and easy though
     
  2. sosolid4u09

    sosolid4u09 4 8 15 16 23 42 banned Full Member

    12,433
    3
    Jun 21, 2008
    Very recently id have to go with haye/harisson and wlad/mormeck.
     
  3. Karl Jade

    Karl Jade Active Member Full Member

    1,277
    0
    Mar 24, 2008
    Haye's 2010 consisting of defences against Ruiz and Harrison. Pathetic.
     
  4. Peril

    Peril The Scholar Full Member

    9,183
    664
    Jan 6, 2011
    I personally would go with Pac-Sugar Shane. Picking up an opponent off a shutout loss and a draw with a nobody, is a terrible choice for an arguably #1 p4p fighter
     
  5. sosolid4u09

    sosolid4u09 4 8 15 16 23 42 banned Full Member

    12,433
    3
    Jun 21, 2008
    one was a mandatory..and one was an ENORMOUS payday against Audley Harrison..how many of us would not have jumped at that??
     
  6. MexicanMuscle

    MexicanMuscle Mexican Powerhouse Full Member

    3,345
    0
    May 7, 2009
    This!:deal
     
  7. Rudyard

    Rudyard **** How You Feel!! HOE! banned

    27,672
    1
    Jan 30, 2009
    on top of it being one of the worst title defenses...you could also make a case for it being a bull**** stoppage! Not once in that clip was Manfredo!

    Pathetic!:verysad
     
  8. ceestar1

    ceestar1 Active Member Full Member

    1,197
    0
    Apr 22, 2011
    recently has to be Felix Sturm back to back recent defences.
     
  9. ceestar1

    ceestar1 Active Member Full Member

    1,197
    0
    Apr 22, 2011
    Yep totally agree, was at that ****ing fight and was pisssssed!!
     
  10. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    24
    Jul 28, 2008
    mandatory means about as much as big tits on an ugly woman.....
    mandatory to fight a guy in ruiz who had 2 wins in 7 years and inactive for nearly 2 years.....says alot.....
    and fraudley.....

    i guess anyone with no ****ing shame would jump at it
     
  11. sosolid4u09

    sosolid4u09 4 8 15 16 23 42 banned Full Member

    12,433
    3
    Jun 21, 2008
    if i remember correctly, it was contractual that he had to fight Ruiz next, because he stepped aside to allow haye the shot at SNV.

    Plus you telling me you'd turn down £20 MILLION + against Fraudley?
    The boxing fans suffer, but i cant blame the righter really
     
  12. BlackWall

    BlackWall Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,869
    0
    Jul 20, 2010

    this

    and toe vs fraudley
     
  13. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    24
    Jul 28, 2008
    that gets worse and worse and worse everytime i watch it.....OMG that ref saved manfredos life...we should all be thankful for his hair trigger stoppage :rofl
     
  14. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    51,687
    24
    Jul 28, 2008
    how did he step aside? ruiz fought and lost to valuev in aug 2008 for the 2nd time.... youre telling me somehow ruiz was set to fight Valuev a 3rd time after losing the first 2 without being active for 15 months when Haye fought him in nov 2009? that doesnt sound right to me
     
  15. sosolid4u09

    sosolid4u09 4 8 15 16 23 42 banned Full Member

    12,433
    3
    Jun 21, 2008
    i remember reading that somewhere. ill check it out i may be wrong. But it was definitely a mandatory for Haye. If thats believable then its not that much more of a stretch that he was in line for a shot at Valuev before Haye was

    EDIT: found a link

    [url]http://www.boxnews.com.ua/en/news/5740/2009-08-26/Haye-Valuev-in-Place-To-Go-John-Ruiz-To-Step-Aside[/url]