What is Vitlai Klitschko’s most impressive boxing stastics?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Mendoza, Mar 10, 2008.


  1. 2smart4u

    2smart4u Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,820
    0
    Dec 16, 2004
    :lol: Its funny how you fail to mention the fact that the KLITs would have had the titles and the pro-mo rights to the grand prize of boxing had VLAD won ! but after all the bizzarness you still dont think anything fishy went on ! But you will gladly claim the same promotor would have something to do with HOLY LL ect ! :hi:
     
  2. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    279
    Jul 22, 2004
    I was

    Actually many Wlad fans (I think including yourself) blamed the vaseline for the Brewster defeat. Many threads were made on them. It was claimed Souza was on the payroll for Don King

    Many claimed Wlad was drugged
     
  3. People love to hate the Klits but I can't figure out exactly why. A part of me wonders if it is racial on some level but I don't want to believe it.

    Why should Vitali have fought injured or less than 100% for your entertainment? The man was in it to win. If he fought and lost by KO / points while injured we'd all be here calling him a chump, fraud etc.

    Vitali went through that HW division like a freight train!!! Chumps or champs that KO % is ****ing impressive! Also any fool can see Lewis weighed his odds and done a runner when it came to the rematch - 8 months? 8 MONTHS?!?! Come on!
    Plus when he got that belt Vitali stamped his authority on it, ABC belts or not at that time he was the legitimate HW champion and everyone knew it. And please, don't bring up the whole Rahman argument.......
     
  4. Fighting Weight

    Fighting Weight Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,428
    3
    Jan 10, 2005
    Wasn't Rahman a two time champion when he was supposed to fight VITLAY, or did he become a 2 time champion when VITLAY pulled out of the fight? I lose track of all the bull**** in the heavies so I'm not sure on that one. Bottom line is, Rahman was a former champ who got the belt by beating Lewis, VITLAY became number 2 in the world by losing to Lewis.

    I don't think either guy was ducking, but I don't accept that the Klitschko fight left unanswered questions. Anyone watching the fight could see the way it was going to end, the referee did Klitschko a MASSIVE favour by stopping it but sometimes I wish he hadn't just so we wouldn't have this constant bull**** talked about it.
     
  5. Fighting Weight

    Fighting Weight Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,428
    3
    Jan 10, 2005
    I agree with you :happy :rasta :thumbsup :good :happy
     
  6. 2smart4u

    2smart4u Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,820
    0
    Dec 16, 2004
    :lol: Classic distorting but ammusing none the less !:yep
     
  7. barneyrub

    barneyrub Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,077
    3
    Aug 2, 2004
    He was underdog because Holyfield was the IBF WBA champ and was [wrongly] considered the true champion whereas the American media werent interested in this British guy who they all thought would of gotten beaten by Riddick Bowe had Bowe bothered to fight him. It was only after the Holyfield fights that Lewis got any respect from the media although the insiders and fighters knew how good he was.

    Lewis was old, heavier than ever, unmotivated and coming off over a years inactivity and he still won.
     
  8. Fighting Weight

    Fighting Weight Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,428
    3
    Jan 10, 2005
    There's a huge difference between fixing scorecards and poisoning someone with vaseline, or sugar, or whatever the **** is the latest excuse. King must be an absolute ****ing genius to get the poison to work 1/100ths of a second after Brewsters left hook landed too :deal

    Credit to King if he did fix the scorecards for Lewis/Holyfield then it was a masterstroke paying off the British judge :shock:
     
  9. Fighting Weight

    Fighting Weight Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,428
    3
    Jan 10, 2005
    I thought you were being serious for a moment there :rofl :rofl :rofl
     
  10. 2smart4u

    2smart4u Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,820
    0
    Dec 16, 2004
    :patsch he was the underdog dog because he looked beatable ! he fought the way he always fought ! PS my bet its guys like you who claim HOLMs had a great win against a truely inactive and injured COONY ? :yep LL was just fine and won a great fighty ! But enough with the bias bull**** ! :deal
     
  11. barneyrub

    barneyrub Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,077
    3
    Aug 2, 2004
    yes he "stamped his authority on the Belt" by defending it only once and against Danny Williams! He even took longer to stop him then Audley Harrison did!

    There you are complaining about Lewis making Vitali wait "8 months" lol. How long did Vitali string Rahman along for?

    How long did Vitali string Sam Peter along for last year by forcing negotiations with the WBC, Peter and Maskaev? Then months later when the deal was put on the table for him to fight Maskaev he decided he didnt want the fight afterall and would take a tune up first while Maskaev fought Peter lol!!!!!!
     
  12. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    52,185
    27,654
    Jan 3, 2007
     
  13. 2smart4u

    2smart4u Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,820
    0
    Dec 16, 2004
    :patsch So you really think it would take a genious ? The fight stank and you know it ! The circumstancial evidence along with the bizzar events are pretty obvious ! And If you dont think anyone is capable of this with the enormous ammount of money at stake your not as bright as I think you are !:D
     
  14. 2smart4u

    2smart4u Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,820
    0
    Dec 16, 2004
     
  15. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    52,185
    27,654
    Jan 3, 2007
    Yet Lewis showing up at a career high weight indicates that he was in the best shape of his career and thoroughly prepared for a top flight challenge??? It seems to me that you're arguing, using the one way street approach.