i like a fight to end around the 4th or 5th which for me is perfect. a toe to toe war or a surprise comeback but not a big fan of points wins unless there where a few knockdowns or some classy punches thrown. its hard for me to sit down and rewatch a fight knowing its a distant fight ie any of hopkins bouts
I like that too...but given a choice between mayweather - gatti or Ward - Gatti I will take ward-gatti
NO doubt! i think the pole indicates that most of the people would like to see a fight simmilar to Gatti- Ward then PBF-Gatti
I voted WAR, but I appreciate a good tactical boxing match. I really like to see contrasting styles. It's always fun to watch a good tactical boxer against a good stalker or brawler.
A big fan of boxing,like many people on this forum, appreciates for shure a good tactical fight, I do. But my heart beats harder when i see to fighters toe-to-toe and fight there souls out.
Why didn't I get the memo that Arthur Abraham is a technical fighter like Mayweather and Winky Wright now??? Damn Gmail must be ****ing up again...
Abraham is a verry good tehnical fighter, i didn't say he is at same level with Maywether and Winky, i just gaved him as an example.
Really. I totally disagree. Just because he spends a lot of time under a guard I don't think makes him a technical fighter. His D isn't all that great (He gets hit quite a bit more than he should), his footwork is kind of lacking and his power shots tend to be long, wild and looping. Not a knock on AA whatsoever, he does what he does quite well (obviously) but his style to me doesn't scream technical fighter the way I think of one.
Tactical wars. I'm not big into sloppy wars without a lot of skill involved. However, a war between two guys who can actually box is the best.