What made Marvin Hagler so great?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by sugarjay, Jan 4, 2015.


  1. Drew101

    Drew101 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    29,769
    8,298
    Feb 11, 2005
    Plus, Marvin beat Obel twice, and Obel dethroned Park, so there's that, as well. :D
     
  2. salsanchezfan

    salsanchezfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,800
    11,424
    Aug 22, 2004
    Another thing to note is that from what I remember, the first Hamsho fight represented the first million-dollar payday of Marvin's career, so to say it wasn't lucrative is plain old not knowing what the hell you're talking about. That was a huge milestone for him. A million back in 1981 meant something.
     
  3. Saad54

    Saad54 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,832
    6,600
    Dec 10, 2014
    Freakish strength for a 160 lb fighter. Great chin. Great conditioning. Great desire to win.
     
  4. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007
    I agree. You could say he would have done well from 1890-1987.

    If you want to downgrade him a bit, he fought a few smaller guys in legacy fights ( Duran, Hearns, Leonard ), wasn't the most skilled fighter around, and for some reason had it on cruise control in some fights.
     
  5. Saad54

    Saad54 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,832
    6,600
    Dec 10, 2014
    Do you realize the 168 division was considered a joke when it started then. Only the IBF recognized it until 1987. No one, and I mean No one was calling for Hagler to fight for that title. Sutherland and Park were retreads who had failed in their respective divisions.

    You probably weren't born yet so I understand your confusion. :lol:
     
  6. Saad54

    Saad54 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,832
    6,600
    Dec 10, 2014
    Moving from 160 to 175 would have been a big jump. at 5/9 he would have been at a huge height and reach disadvantage to the 6/3 Spinks. And the 168 division was a joke when Hagler reigned at 160 lbs. The only money option above 160 lbs would have been Spinks and that would have been a huge risk against a much bigger guy in his prime. I think Hagler did the right thing staying at 160 lbs.
     
  7. Entaowed

    Entaowed Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,837
    4,174
    Dec 16, 2012
    Though Spinks at most 6' 2 1/2" I agree completely.

    Spinks was a top ATG at LHW, prime then, & fought at up to 212 & lean as a HW.
    Hagler was one of the very greatest ever, but that would have been too much to expect from anyone.