What pathetic controversy will Floyd use to sell the rematch?

Maybe I'm missing something, but this one seems pretty obvious. A good amount of fans who watched that first fight thought Maidana won. That seems like a good selling point.

 

Who knows? He shouldn't be fighting Maidana twice though, waste of fights.

 

How? The ref is chosen by the state athletic commission

Maidana wore Everlast Powerlock gloves the last time. That's a puncher's glove, the same gloves Matthysse uses. I think he should be able to use any commisison approved glove out there, but he's not being made to wear pillows

That's your opinion. However, you're also of the opinion that Floyd can pick the ref and that Maidana will wear pillows. That's irrelevant anyway. You asked what controversy would be used as a selling point. The answer is obvious, the public perception of the outcome of the first fight.

 

So Floyd wears pillows? And still wins?

 

he does not have to use a pathetic controversy. Pac is fighting Chris, Pac sells floyds fight by fighting a non worthy opponet. Not saying Midana is worthy but he has more star power & fan friendly style to fans.

Biggest PPV of the year already passed with Canelo vs Lara.

 

He already started with Maidana being a dirty fighter!!!

What a Farce this fight is...

 

This is a lame comeback from a Mayweather fan. Everyone knows Floyd has brittle hands and needs pillows to protect it. He doesn't need to hurt or stop his opponents to win and just contented to win on points. Meanwhile, Maidana thrives on hurting and slowing hus oppobents down. Floyd wants to minimize the hurt by forcing Maidana to wear more paddings as possible.

 

Floyd: Well, at least he aint algieri

 

Why shouldn't Floyd take a rematch?

A lot of people thought it was close, and that Maidana won.

It's what he did when a lot of people thought Castillo beat him in their first fight.

 

Do you have any shred of proof over your claims? The process for picking out the ref is laid out there, it's done by the Commission. If you want to lay claim that the commission are blatently breaking their rules and allowing for a huge conflict of interests by allowing one of the fighters to pick out the ref, then surely you have some sort of proof to back up such a claim. Or maybe we should jus all take your word for it on the basis that you believe it's laughable to not believe your unsubstantiated claim?