What percentage would you give Pac beating Canelo 154?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by buckdacious, Mar 9, 2014.


  1. DavidChao

    DavidChao A contender,.. a somebody Full Member

    1,224
    0
    Sep 19, 2009
    Prime Pac would have a 90 percent chance of winning.

    Current Pac has a 70 percent chance of winning.

    Canelo is not an elite fighter just because he had a widely contested decision over Trout and lost to Mayweather in humiliating fashion. He is green, unproven, devoid of a good resume, and lacks the skills, refinement, and intangibles of an ATG. Furthermore, Pacquiao is a bad match up for him in my honest opinion. Canelo trying to diversify his skillset is great, but his slick Mexican impersonation won't work against Pacquiao. If anything, he would be lured into a brawl with Pacquiao and would get sliced up badly.
     
  2. Miles5149

    Miles5149 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,822
    0
    Dec 30, 2007
    :lol: Oh you know me? That's funny. Speaking of dumb, look at your post. Holy ****. You must be Filipino, right?

    And with you admitting to being biased that makes you either a loser or a 15 year old. I'm guessing both so there's really no reason to even waste my time with you. Carry on with your worthless existence elsewhere pal. Take it easy.
     
  3. Miles5149

    Miles5149 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,822
    0
    Dec 30, 2007
    He's a biased Filipino Pacturd. Give him a break.
     
  4. Jordan_Davies

    Jordan_Davies Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,502
    0
    Jul 28, 2011
    0 chance.

    Provodnikov who is the 140 WBO holder hurt Bradley worse than Pacquiao did in 2 fights than Pac managed to do

    if you asked me this after Pacquiao/Marquez or Rios then id say Pac stands a good chance at winning 9-3 the guy but fighting at the full weight class limit rather than 150 would slow him down plus Canelos massive size advantage and Pacquiao's recent performance where his combinations were slower and shorter than in the past

    Pacquiao would likely get sparked out if this wasnt at a catchweight against a much more younger/fresher fighter
     
  5. ryan_c

    ryan_c Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,507
    30
    Oct 6, 2007
    That thing with Bradley, he is agile(and has more skills). Canelo is not agile, he is too stationary and slow to beat Pacquiao.
     
  6. Bee KeepZ

    Bee KeepZ Roid City Full Member

    3,466
    1
    Nov 13, 2009
    THIS.

    It was this type of mentality that did Hatton, DLH, Cotto, and Margarito in.

    Canelo is strong but he doesn't have the hand speed of fighters at the lower weight classes, those who fight Pacquaio the 1st time have a tough time ad******g to his style and speed.

    It would be a good fight, I'd give Pacquaio a really good shot at beating Canelo. Speed kills.
     
  7. judgeJAB

    judgeJAB Skills to pay the bills! Full Member

    1,764
    3
    May 23, 2010
    Obvious Floyd fanboy asking a weighted question.


    To answer the question, I'd give PAC a solid 35% chance, he will have good moments to do damage, although he'll take a beating. If he wins, it's a TKO on cuts inside 9 IMO. Otherwise he'll get stopped.
     
  8. MetalLicker

    MetalLicker I Am Full Member

    24,055
    27,554
    Feb 10, 2011
    I give Pac a 50% chance.

    Why? Because Canelo is slow on his feet. Pac will be the small guy and he'll be chased around, but he's too slow to catch Pac.

    There 2 things that work in Pac's favor.

    1. Canelo still has questionable stamina. Pac just fought 12 rounds and still look fresh.
    2. Canelo has poor footwork. Pac can move around like very few can.

    He will have a HUGE weight and size advantage though. Speed is not just about hands. It's also about the feet and Canelo looks slow in that department.
     
  9. kiwi_boxer

    kiwi_boxer nighty night, ellerbe ☠ ☠ ☠ banned Full Member

    5,716
    5,747
    Aug 25, 2013
    Stopped reading.
     
  10. Bee KeepZ

    Bee KeepZ Roid City Full Member

    3,466
    1
    Nov 13, 2009
    Hatton wanted the fight at catchweight Mayweather said no.
     
  11. buckdacious

    buckdacious Sin~City punks!!! Full Member

    26,774
    8
    Jul 25, 2008
    Canelo actually doesnt have poor footowork. its actually pretty good. Pac throws wild 4-5 punch combos, he would get countered alot...i mean ALOT!! Canelo would take some punches obviously but Pac would get hit but some punches he's probably never got hit with before.
     
  12. remi

    remi Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,701
    0
    Jul 7, 2008
    000000000000000000%%%%%%%%%%%%%
     
  13. remi

    remi Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,701
    0
    Jul 7, 2008
    Pac can't beat this guy, are you guys on PEDS?
     
  14. kiwi_boxer

    kiwi_boxer nighty night, ellerbe ☠ ☠ ☠ banned Full Member

    5,716
    5,747
    Aug 25, 2013
    buck, congratulations. You made the cut.

    [url]http://www.boxingforum24.com/showthread.php?t=504150[/url]
     
  15. Green Man

    Green Man Guest

    Look at this desperate ***** dumbass turning racist, What a pathetic sack of **** you are.:lol::lol:

    As for the biased part, gotta love the irony and the hypocrisy of your hoe ass.

    *****s keep getting dumber and dumber cant wait for Floyd to retire so these losers can go back to where they belong, The WWE.