There isn't one place. Campillo-Shumenov was in Las Vegas, today's bad decisions were in Turkey and Germany. I have seen countless terrible decisions on British television (Fury-Mcdermott for example) etc etc... In the current system, the judges are appointed by the promotor. If the judge has the promotors boxer losing on his scorecard, do you think he'll get asked to judge again in the future? Of course not, the system's just rotten.
There's been many places like the dirrell-froch scorecard but lately in the U.S i have to say houston texas. Freaking suck cuz i live in texas but houston has had 2 bad scorecard John-Juarez 1 and Malignaggi-Diaz 1.
Are we going to start keeping track of robberies now? If that's the case, how about a thread with good decisions as well as good scorecards?
England: All because of Terry O'Conner. Seriously what the **** is wrong with that man. He single handedly was responsible for changing the rules in British boxing. EVERY fight I have watched his scorecards are some of the worst I have ever seen. Domestically our judging is a joke. Germany is not as bad as it is made out to be, some other Euro countries are MUCH worse. The US scoring is probebly the best OVERALL but there have been some absolute shockers too. Overall I think British domestic scoring is a joke. I mean I usually stand up for my country but Terry O'Conner. He MUST be on the good stuff. The US has the best scoring in general.
Ahh yes... Italy how could I forget. There is some corrupt **** going on over there. Probs worst in the EU...
Germany and Europe You practically have to dominate from start to finish to win on points over their fighter and even then u still need to be worry God forbid its close or competitive ....u lost already U will never win a close fight over there Dirrell/Froch is a Perfect example of that