What round will Jermell Miller KTFO scrub Washington in?

Loma wanted Rigo? Hmmm.

 

I criticize Stevenson and Wilder for a reason... They are the absolute WORST offenders.... If Lomachenko makes this a habit I'll criticize him, hell I didn't criticize Crawford for fighting Molina because he had a good track record for the most part(a lot of people on here were ripping that fight to shreds) If you want to talk about agenda... Why do you hop on the Lomachenko criticism wagon first chance you get but argue tooth and nail whenever the likes Wilder and even Stevenson are criticized.... The two WORST offenders of MEANINGLESS voluntary title defenses in the sport?

 

I honestly don't care about belts being unified. I want to see the best fight the best. I don't like to see young 22 year old talent get derailed by a guy in his prime. Tank is nowhere near his prime.

 

FYI I was one of the first to criticize Crawford/Molina. Why didn't you get on me for that. I actually stated several times that I had 0 interest in the fight and would not be watching it live. The reason I was more vocal about criticizing Crawford is because he also is a top 5 p4p guy in my books.

 

Lol "GGG nutriders". I'm not like you, your agenda is clear as far as your favorite fighters. I am not a GGG fan at all and also don't like his style. Stated it multiple times. His division is crap anyway. Both bum killers you love have fighters available in their division that they can fight and have made no efforts to do so.

 

That's a fair point, but you can't criticise Loma's opponent if he can't get guys like Tank to fight him.

There were still really big fights at 126 for Loma, guys at 130 don't want to know also. I think it's going to take Loma having to have 1-3 average fights everytime to get a good one, that will be the cycle I feel.

 

Fair enough. If you can admit GGG is a bum killer, I can admit Stevenson is too. But the difference also is Stevenson is not considered one of the best LHW of all time like GGG was before Jacobs derailed him. Stevenson wasn't considered a top 3 p4p guy like GGG is/was. Guys who are rated that high deserve more criticism imo.

 

I didn't have any interest in it either, but I'm not going to crucify or harshly criticize someone for a bad or mediocre fight when they've got a good track record of facing the best opposition available. When they hold a belt hostage for years a time facing the worst opponents possible? Yeah... That's when I'll become a critic.

 

Of course I can. Are you telling me that the best Loma's team could do is find someone up a weight below coming off a loss? Why not take Rigo's offer at 130? No he won't get full credit if he beat him due to the massive size difference, but it's still way better. Loma also does bring a lot of money believe it or not. I'm sure he could have gotten a better opponent at 130. Yes a lot of champions with high upside are ducking him, but I'm sure there are some solid veterans that would be willing to fight him for the right offer.

 

Molina was still a far better fight than Marriaga. Let's get that straight. He fought a guy bigger than him who has fought in that division, and was coming off beating Povetkin. Marriaga has literally beat no one.

 

Ok dude... Whatever you say, you're clearly very upset when people point out the truth about Wilder.

 

**** not Povetkin. I meant Provodnikov LOL. Dude been irrelevant so long I forgot his name. Not that upset. I just don't like double standards. I also tend to like to defend fighters who get the most bashed with actual logic. Nothing to do with Wilder.

 

Sure!

 

I have to agree with you all on this one AJ has one of the worst chins in boxing today.

 

But GGG is fighting who is available to him. It's different. He just fought the best guy he could fight at his division in Jacobs. It's not the same as Wilder or Stevenson. I'm not saying GGG's resume is good because I don't think it is, but that's a product of his division being weak.